Yeah it's probably just a F clef in a different position, and drawn by either the
composer or a transcriber, sometimes when music is not printed but copied the clefs
can look kinda weird, I agree with Laura that it's probably a C clef, but it depends
where it's located on the staff, it being a
Hi,
I have a score with a similar structure as the example attached below.
This seems to work fine, the output is correct, but I get lots of warnings
"Symbol is not a parent context: Staff. Ignored", apparently one for each
note in the first staff.
What does this warning mean, and how can I ge
On Wednesday 17 July 2002 05:08, I wrote:
> I have a piece with one GrandStaff containing two Staffs. Now I'm
> looking for a way to reduce the distance between the staves, because
> there's too much unused space, and if I could reduce it, I could easily
> fit at least one more line on the same pa
> "Erik" == Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Erik> Hi,
Erik> I am typesetting some Italian instrumental works from around the 1750s, and
Erik> found something that looks and behaves like a clef, but I have never seen
Erik> anything like it before and it is not in Li
Hi,
I am typesetting some Italian instrumental works from around the 1750s, and
found something that looks and behaves like a clef, but I have never seen
anything like it before and it is not in Lilypond's set of glyphs. Does
anyone have a clue about what it could be?
In ASCII art, it looks s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Having recently upgraded to lilypond 1.5.68 (debian unstable package),
> I was trying the figured bass context (which would be by the way very
> usefull for me). I have a question: Is it possible to have plus sign,
> like this:
>4+
>2
> and an overstrike \ sig
Hi,
Having recently upgraded to lilypond 1.5.68 (debian unstable package),
I was trying the figured bass context (which would be by the way very
usefull for me). I have a question: Is it possible to have plus sign,
like this:
4+
2
and an overstrike \ sign (as in the textscript #'(columns
