LGTM - I'll push to staging if there are no objections in 24h.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6434048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 28 août 2012, at 15:17, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> With --disable-optimisation passed to configure, Janek's score at:
>>
>> www.mikesolomon.org/tota-pulchra.zip
>>
>> fails with the assertion failure on line 252 of the current grob-property.c
tps://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Should be fine...it's the same grob (OctavateEight).
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2012-09-17 05:01, ornello wrote:
James wrote
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commitdiff;h=35725a573e47be7c02c51964641ea534fb88be6b
Does this help?
james
Hmm... I see that in lookup.cc the call to the backend function
bezier-sandwich has been replaced by native PS c
On 2012-09-19 05:40, Ramana Kumar wrote:
2) Create an ugly-lily.ly [1] file. This file would remove
several engravers, change most callbacks to hardcoded values and
have everything spaced on one line unless breaks were forced and
would output the document to a huge page. This could be used for
On 5 nov. 2012, at 00:40, aleksandr.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6584045/diff/13014/input/regression/kievan-notation.ly
> File input/regression/kievan-notation.ly (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/6584045/diff/13014/input/regression/kievan-notation.ly#newco
> Re: Uses single algorithm for side-position spacing. (issue 6827072)
>
> {\clef bass
> 2..->
> << r16 \\ r \\ r \\ r \\ >> eeses'16
> \set fingeringOrientations = #'(right)
> 8-1-4 r
> r2 }
>
Beautiful ugly test case. Even with current master it is atrocious. I've fixed
everything
On 19 nov. 2012, at 03:46, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:21:51 -0800, m...@mikesolomon.org
> wrote:
>
>> if (to_boolean (me->get_property ("add-stem-support"))
>> && Stem::has_interface (e))
>> skyline.set_min_height (e->extent (common_y, _Y_AXIS)[dir]);
>>
>> That's pseudo-co
On 30 nov. 2012, at 07:25, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
> 'finger-chords.ly' is still in disagreement with its texidoc (therefore
> failing). You could adjust that regtest in light of the new defaults,
> of course.
>
> Better might be to make Fingering.add-stem-support = #only-if-beamed
> the new
On 21 déc. 2012, at 14:01, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
>> I have two 16ish-hour flights this holiday season and I'll be filling them
>> with composition, Sudoku, and LilyPond programming. So, this is the time to
>> send me:
>> 1) Features you ne
Hey all,
The regtest outside-staff-placement-directive.ly is currently not doing what
it's supposed to because of \textLengthOn, which masks the effects of the
placement algorithm. I must have inadvertently added that during a moment of
sleeplessness...
I'll propose a patch fixing this unless
On 28 janv. 2013, at 06:33, Keith OHara wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:45:16 -0800, m...@mikesolomon.org
> wrote:
>
>> On 26 janv. 2013, at 23:21, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
>>
>>> The tracker says the overall goal is to remove a call to the function
>>> translate_axis. In the example
>>>
ily/side-position-interface.cc#newcode461
> lily/side-position-interface.cc:461: MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK
> (Side_position_interface, outside_staff_aligned_side, 1);
> Sure, something called "outside_staff_aligned_side" is so obvious in
> meaning that we don't need to ex
On 8 mars 2013, at 13:54, d...@gnu.org wrote:
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/19022/ly/spanners-init.ly
> File ly/spanners-init.ly (right):
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/7424049/diff/19022/ly/spanners-init.ly#newcode114
> ly/spanners-init.ly:114: breakSlur = #(make-music 'Br
On 10 mars 2013, at 18:54, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@mikesolomon.org" writes:
>
>> On 10 mars 2013, at 18:32, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Ok folks, it is this time of the year again: I am trying to make
>> myself
>> unpopular.
>>
>> There's a time of the year for that?
>>
>> It a
On 29 mars 2013, at 12:57, janek.lilyp...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2013/03/29 04:52:29, MikeSol wrote:
>> On 2013/03/27 21:50:02, janek wrote:
>>> I see that these overrides solve the problem, but it would be nice
> to know why
>>> this works. Can you write an explanation? What was wrong with the
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:25:56 +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
I've lost track of where we are with convert-ly.
I have just ran update-with-convert-ly. I saw a flag change from
2.15.10. I have pushed that.
I know that there are other syntax changes that people want to
make. Somebody make a patch
may have impacted things.
Don't think so: I think I rebased dev/staging before that.
Afterwards,
the merge should have just been a painless fast-forward. Weird, all
in
all.
Mike: try the old instructions here to get the branch:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/d
On Oct 29, 2011, at 9:51 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> sorry about losing track of this.
>
> No need to apologize: _my_ computer is far too slow to be useful for
> bisection, anyway. It looks like we will have a bit of bijection
> flakiness for a while until we get th
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 15:19:03 -0800, Joe Neeman wrote:
Bah, I just wrote out a nice reply on the codereview site and it got
eaten...
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:03 AM, m...@apollinemike.com [3] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 2:19 AM, joenee...@gmail.com [1] wrote:
>
http://codereview.appspot.co
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:06:53 +, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
Looks okay to me.
The ghost of the SpanBar (left over from the issue 910 patch)
sometimes
has an effect
\new GrandStaff <<
\new Staff { e'1 | eses'''4 r2. | e'1 }
\new Staff { e'1 | e'1 | eses4 r2. } >>
Something like
\
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:02:00 +, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/5364048/diff/4001/Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/programming-work.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5364048/diff/4001/Documentation/contribut
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:16:46 +, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
I like the direction of this change.
Does it actually work?
The code has your trademark incomprehensibility,
Thank you, Keith. You know, sometimes, people think that it comes
naturally to be so incomprehensible, but it's actua
choirs and said "have at it," I would get 10 very different versions of
the piece and probably none of them would resemble the recording
(whether or not they'd be better is another question). However, if I
put more vague indications like "freak out in the style of Mik
Plan for revising markups ::
NAMESPACE MANGLING OF GROB PROPERTIES
--) function
All grob properties will be associated with their interface. So, `Y-extent'
will no longer be internally represented as `Y-extent' but rather
`Y-extent@grob-interface'. When someone does:
\override Stem #'Y-exte
On Jan 5, 2012, at 7:51 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Grob::get_vertical_axis_group is not protected against the case where g
> has an axis group interface but no Y_AXIs parent.
I thought it was. If g has no Y_AXIS parent, then when get_vertical_axis_group
(g->get_parent (Y_AXIS)); is called, the
h the
Documentation/snippets/bar-chords-notation-for-guitar--with-text-spanner.ly
which is duplicated in snippets/new. Mike - you only need to edit
the one in snippets/new - the other should be updated in the LSR, and
it will appear in snippets/ when an LSR import is run. However, the
snippets/new o
Hey all,
I'm trying to design a regtest for the DOM-id property. Ideally, I'd
like to generate an svg file that is then checked by a python script to
make sure that the property has been correctly set.
I have sketches of the files in question (see attached) and I'm
wondering how I could des
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:07:35 -, Phil Holmes wrote:
A large number of changes in tests with slurs: see
lyric-extender-completion.png for example. Assume these are Mike's
changes to make slur bounding boxes lass rectangular.
Are there any changes that result in collisions? The gamble with
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:28:46 +, d...@gnu.org wrote:
On 2012/01/10 13:18:03, dak wrote:
On 2012/01/10 12:59:21, Reinhold wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> From a lazy user's POV, I don't like that I now have to use
\default
for
> auto-numbering (which is th typical case)...
It is the same as with \mar
1. more people need to know how to run the script.
(it's not hard; far easier than setting up apache)
I can do this if...
2. it would be good to have something in the CG about Patchy.
...you can do this.
I also think that Patchy needs to be part of the LilyPond source.
Cheers,
MS
__
Moving to devel:
I think this bounty slush fund needs to happen soon-ish - there's been
two rounds of talking about it, which is great, but it will remain talk
unless someone does something. I also understand that David is in the
position of not wanting to do a full court press for organizing
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:24:40 +, Graham Percival wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:01:50AM -0800, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
1) Create an e-mail address "contrib...@lilypond.org" (this I can't
do - can someone please do this).
Can't do.
Seems simple, effective, and startable in the nex
On Feb 10, 2012, at 3:05 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> "m...@apollinemike.com" writes:
>
>> On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> David Kastrup writes:
>>>
David Kastrup writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
>
>> Just a very quick look: I notice you're c
I'm working with the University of Paris VIII to get a computer consecrated to
the cause. Once that happens, we'll have a new patchy platform. It's also
good to have that sorta institutional alliance when it comes to applying to
stuff like GSoC.
Cheers,
MS
On Mar 16, 2012, at 8:41 PM, Graham
http://codereview.appspot.com/6035053/diff/16001/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6035053/diff/16001/lily/beam.cc#newcode1328
lily/beam.cc:1328: return scm_from_double (0.0);
On 2012/04/25 06:21:29, Keith wrote:
It would seem we do not want an early return i
2/04/25 06:21:54, Keith wrote:
Mike, any idea why you added this?
It just adds to the cases where we lie and say the beam is on the
centerline.
It causes this to go wrongly
<< {b''8[ r16. g''32] } \\ {r8 16. r } >>
Take a look at today's patchset at
http://
uot;calculation-in-progress"))
On 2012/04/25 06:29:14, mike7 wrote:
> On 2012/04/25 06:21:54, Keith wrote:
> > Mike, any idea why you added this?
> > It just adds to the cases where we lie and say the beam is on the
centerline.
> > It causes this to go wrongly
> > <
On 2012/04/25 11:25:02, Graham Percival wrote:
First, editing embedded javascript is not a general solution.
Second, I'm not at all certain we want to have commercial
announcements in that
area. I'm sorry if I gave the impression that this was to be a green
light for
any kind of announcem
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/4/lily/beam.cc
File lily/beam.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4860043/diff/4/lily/beam.cc#newcode1743
lily/beam.cc:1743: Beam::pure_rest_collision_callback (SCM smob, SCM
prev_offset,
On 2012/04/27 06:06:21, Keith wrote:
Mike, Based on their
Hey all,
The new patchset puts the tweets in a separate xml file. I use xml
instead of txt to avoid parsing annoyances. The only problem is that,
because the xml is in a DOM structure, the individual tweets can't
contain sub-nodes, which means that if someone wants to use anchor tags
or whateve
I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely with
the .xml extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
Hmm...it looks like the xml mime type is defined, so I'm short on ideas
for why it's not uploading to Rietveld correctly.
Below are the contents of tweets.xml:
The Ensemble 101 is going on a European tour where they'll sing music
typeset using LilyPond. Click Re: Add announcements to the upper right corner of the website (issue 6068045)
On 2012/04/27 07:53:06, Graham Percival wrote:
On 2012/04/27 07:49:30, mike7 wrote:
> I also just realized that git-cl does not know how to play nicely
with the
.xml
> extension, so the patch can't be tested. I'll investigate...
Have you tried adding it to line 26 of git-cl ?
I added:
mi
On 2012/04/27 07:55:54, Graham Percival wrote:
LGTM, one minor question but it's ok with me.
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi
File Documentation/web.texi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6068045/diff/13001/Documentation/web.texi#newcode172
Docu
On 2012/04/27 08:49:09, Graham Percival wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/6092045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi
File Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/6092045/diff/1/Documentation/contributor/website-work.itexi#newcode
I've included before and after photos.
Cheers,
MS
0001-Potential-fix-for-issue-39.patch
Description: Binary data
<><>___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hey all,
I am trying to understand beam-quanting.cc better, and I think I know how I'm
gonna tackle this.
I'm going to put my collision callback before beam quanting, and then try
something to the effect of:
if (the beam was pushed up during the collision callback)
impose an insanely prohibi
On Mar 13, 2011, at 10:30 PM, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc
> File lily/beam.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4237057/diff/11001/lily/beam.cc#newcode206
> lily/beam.cc:206: orig->set_property ("feather-fraction", scm_cons
On May 11, 2011, at 12:02 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4517051/diff/1/lily/arpeggio.cc
> File lily/arpeggio.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/4517051/diff/1/lily/arpeggio.cc#newcode98
> lily/arpeggio.cc:98: MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK (Arpeggio, internal_
On Jun 12, 2011, at 5:49 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2011/06/05 10:18:18, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
>> On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:00 PM, mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>>
>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4527086/diff/7002/scm/output-lib.scm
>>> File scm/output-lib.scm (right):
>>>
>
t a patch on Reitveld for more formal
reviewing.
Thanks!
~Mike
0001-Adds-glissando-stems-to-Lilypond.patch
Description: Binary data
glissando-stem.ly
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/
I've now gone on a quest for parental loops in the source, and I've found some:
chord-repetition.ly
chord-tremolo-articulations.ly
dynamics-alignment-breaker.ly
dynamics-alignment-no-line.ly
dynamics-glyphs.ly
dynamics-line.ly
dynamics-rest-positioning.ly
dynamics-text-right-padding.ly
dynamics-te
Hey all,
I finally got a new branch of the source up and running on my mac after
updating fontforge, and even in the new branch, I get the following error
during make check:
LILYPOND_VERSION=2.15.6
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/bin/python
../../../scripts/lilypond-book.py
oking at
>>> my in-progress Doc patch for footnotes
>>>
>>> --snip--
>>>
>>> \footnote associates a single footnote with a particular event in the
>>> music (usually a NoteEvent); in a certain sense it behaves like
>>> \tweak, though
On Jul 24, 2011, at 11:29 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 23 July 2011 15:48, wrote:
>
>> (a) is currently impossible to calculate in all circumstances, and (c)
>> would require a code dup. I think by making these available as
>> properties, the user can then use this data to fix the problem. In
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:17:59 +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
We have now reached 0 Critical issues. It would be great if we
could verify the fixed issues, and if we could find out if
anything broke in 2.15.10.
Once that's done, I'll go ahead with release candidate 2,
hopefully in a few days. Then
https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/side-position-interface.cc
File lily/side-position-interface.cc (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/12857043/diff/3001/lily/side-position-interface.cc#newcode283
lily/side-position-interface.cc:283: && cross_staff
On 2013/08/14 05:34:18,
Make sure to acknowledge dynamic text in slur-proto-engraver.cc and
tuplet-engraver.cc.
https://codereview.appspot.com/14424044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Janek Warchoł writes:
> Hi,
>
> śr., 5 lut 2020, 00:34 użytkownik napisał:
>
>> What problem are we trying to solve here?
>>
>
> In short, it's been found (I think Mike will be able to give you
> specific
> examples) that having code of conduct encoura
Mike Solomon writes:
> The preamble and intent is one thing; adding a corrective committee with the
> authority to enact punishments based on anonymous reports is another. It
> implements hierarchies and institutions exerting coercive power based on
> incomplete and secret inform
re is a code of conduct with clear steps for
reporting violations and consequences for repeat offenders, so I'm probably not
the best person to make the final call.
~Mike
> What does "implement" mean?
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant merge the PR.
Mike Solomon writes:
>> What does "implement" mean?
>
> Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant merge the PR.
> Uh, words have meanings. There would be no point of putting something
into our documentation that we are not going to follow through with.
By merging it, th
On 2020/02/05 18:17:25, c_sorensen wrote:
> I recognize that Mike Solomon has a different opinion. I mean no
disrespect to
> Mike, Janek, Han-Wen, or any other member of the LilyPond team. I
highly value
> the team spirit of the LilyPond team.
>Well said. Here's the c
re. possible toronto conference location
I live in Toronto, in the Annex. I'd love to help organize something here
if there's interest. I'm right
close to the University of Toronto campus.
-Mike
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 09:19, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
&
re. I live 2 minutes away... I can be there
on a moment's notice, starting next week.
This is exciting!
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 07:48, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Mike!
>
> > I live in Toronto, in the Annex. I'd love to help organize something
> here if there's inte
forward
to working with you towards its amelioration as well as the creation of
user-friendly documentation. If there winds up being enough community
support, I would be thrilled to see this feature included in the Lilypond
source code.
Mike Solomon
woodwind-diagrams-text-graphic.ly
Description
one for each time print
is called, which is N-1 times too many (where N is the length of
broken_into_). The code works just fine, but it is overkill: is there a way
to perform operations on a spanner and its broken_into_'s once before the
print function is called?
Thank
I tried setting a flag like that, but the problem is that the stencils are
drawn in parallel and not in series, so by the time I've set this flag the
other stencils are done doing their thing :-(
~Mike
On 6/2/10 1:32 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
> On 6/2/10 5:28 AM, &qu
Good deal! I used a callback - patch to be sent in the not-too-distant
future.
~Mike
On 6/2/10 4:26 PM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> I am toying around with a new spanner, and before it prints, I need to
>> do
as a sampling rate, including spectrograms and graphical
scores.
Many thanks to the first one of you who posts this on Rietveld!
Cheers,
~Mike
P.S. One thing that the code lacks is stable control of intersections w/
this grob and others - is there a standard way to take care of that? I
cheated in the i
rry about the inconvenience, and thanks in advance for your
feedback!
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
teable - I read the bit online about how they should be formulated,
but I'd appreciate any comments on the subject in case I'm off the mark.
Thanks!
~Mike
On 6/7/10 12:42 AM, "Francisco Vila" wrote:
> 2010/6/6 Mike Solomon :
>> P.P.P.S. I know nothing about Lilypond
Hey Carl,
Your bezier curve suite is wonderful - I need the solver for an entirely
different issue in my waveforms project, which is itching to be thrown on
Reitveld by someone who is more savvy than I! Takers?
~Mike
On 6/8/10 5:59 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
> \On 6/8/10
I second the Frog Meister idea: Carl has been VERY kind in helping me waddle
through Scheme programming, and if there is no one w/ the assigned
responsibility to farm out tasks, then I will likely keep pestering him out
of force of habit.
~Mike
On 6/11/10 9:23 PM, "Graham Percival" wr
ers as well as their lengths (which are the
same, meaning that len(A) = len(B)). Knowing this would save the pain of
using traditional linear algebra solvers, which for a 23x23 matrix is ok,
but for a 10x10 matrix gets cumbersome.
Thank you in advance to any takers who want to help me with
Thank you Patrick!
All of your comments have been incorporated into a new patch, which draws
the svgs a-ok (see attached).
~Mike
On 6/19/10 12:42 AM, "pnor...@gmail.com" wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> This is very impressive. Thanks for your work on this. I just have a
> few
hat bit of code in
the configure file if said maneuver is ok.
~Mike
On 6/8/10 4:08 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 03:46:47PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> Op dinsdag 08-06-2010 om 12:55 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Mike
>> Solomon:
>>
I think it would
be intelligent to roll both of them into one. Patrick: can you look at the
patch and let me know what you think? I have no objection to changing my
work if you feel that there is a better way to implement it along the lines
of the patch that you've uploaded.
~Mike
On
at you think!!! For ideas, check out
http://www.apollinemike.com/lilypond/waveform
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Responses inlined:
On 7/2/10 4:54 PM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Mike Solomon writes:
>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/1720046
>>
>> Hey developers,
>> Today I had time to finish version 2 of my waveform patch that uses glpk
>> to do smooth l
).
~Mike
On 7/2/10 8:31 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
> On 7/2/10 12:03 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:12:03PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Graham Percival writes:
>>>
>>>>> It seems nice to be able t
owing what this function is supposed to do, I am not sure if this is a
problem, but if k is not necessary, perhaps:
Box
Font_metric::get_indexed_char_dimensions (size_t) const
{
return Box (Interval (0, 0), Interval (0, 0));
}
would be bett
ard for me to track down the source of this inconsistent behavior.
Any thoughts would be appreciated!
~Mike
P.S. If any of you are particularly brave, I will send you a patch with my
source...but it's long...
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
offset correctly. Any ideas
from any of all ya¹ll would be greatly appreciated. However, Joe¹s
suggestion to check out Y-offset callbacks has already helped a great deal,
and stuff like the pdf online will certainly be passable for the demos I
need to do this weekend.
Cheers,
Mike
On 7/22/10 8
s it seems like a
not-insignificant move, I'd want to see first if there is community support
and if there is a group of people willing to iron out how this change could
be orchestrated.
Cheers,
Mike
P.S. In an unrelated note, many thanks to Patrick for his work on the path
command, which
7;d like not to have to change
from one form to another afterwards, so if you think modularity seems like
it could become part of lilypond, I'll tackle my project from that angle.
Thanks!
~Mike
On 7/28/10 7:39 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:25:08PM +02
n the many amount of musics in this
world, if lilypond wants to grow to be as wide-reaching as possible, such a
move seems logical for subsequent versions.
Any ideas would be appreciated!
~Mike
On 7/29/10 7:47 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:25:08PM +0
modifications), you
can use the attached.
~Mike
0002-Add-engraver-make-spanner.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
; On 29 July 2010 19:22, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> Name says it all.
>
> Why do you need this?
>
> Since a Spanner's parent class is Grob, ly:engraver-make-grob should
> have no problem creating spanners.
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
>
_
Interesting...thank you.
I completely missed that. Sorry for the clutter :-(
On 7/29/10 9:36 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> On 29 July 2010 20:34, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> I think that this patch is the easiest way to assure that the break
>> processing will happen wh
This raises an error message if showLastLength is not used to show full
measures.
As I am the worst git-cl user ever, if someone could throw this up on
Reitveld, I'd appreciate it.
~Mike
0002-Fix-for-issue-1173-to-fails-when-asked-to-showLastLe.patch
Description: Binary
left boundary is anything other than 0. However, I
don'tunderstand lilypond well enough to know:
a) if this is a good assumption
b) if this assumption breaks something else.
As usual, the first person who throws this on Reitveld gets many thanks.
~Mike
0002-Fixes-issue-1116-by-regulat
On 7/30/10 10:06 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> On 30 July 2010 14:19, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> This raises an error message if showLastLength is not used to show full
>> measures.
>
> Ouch. :)
>
> We should always try to continue compilation (leaving aside s
In this email & the next, I'm attaching two patches that I think I'll need
to make a fully-functional spanner engraver in Scheme. If any of you know
of better ways to do these things than creating Scheme bindings, please let
me know!
http://codereview.appspot.com/1880050
Cheers
http://codereview.appspot.com/1914043
~Mike
0002-Adds-announce-end-grob-to-engraver-scheme.cc.patch
Description: Binary data
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
is ready to be pushed. It would also be a great way for new folks (like me)
to learn - I chose to work on issue 1173 at pseudo-random (Python's random
library) and learned a great deal in doing so.
If there is sufficient interest in this idea, I think it would be a good way
for newcomers a
;ve uploaded to Reitveld and are
waiting review. As soon as they get commented upon and (hopefully) applied
to the source, I will send out a regression test.
~Mike
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Sorry for the slew of patches in this vein - as I run into problems while
trying to create a real engraver in scheme, I'm sending these patches along.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1878048
Cheers,
~Mike
0002-Adds-ly-engraver-property-to-engraver-scheme.patch
Description: Binary
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
