On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 12:23, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> I
>> hope we can switch all platforms away from GUB,
>
> I do too. It’s a good idea in theory, but *way* too complicated.
>
> so this likely needs a
>> general solution then.
>
> Whatever we build here can probably be the first step towar
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 13:35, Kieren MacMillan
wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
>> Proper collaboration tools aren't easy either, but there are solutions
>> like Etherpad. It's open and can be enhanced with plugins, so would a
>> collaborative text editor with a (possibly autorefreshing) preview from
>> Li
I would not suggest investing in the LilyPad GUI, it is essentially a thin
wrapper around the command line. If the GUI is insufficient I’d suggest looking
into Frescobaldi (https://www.frescobaldi.org/).
If after that you still want to update LilyPad it can be found here:
https://github.com/gpe
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 15:57, Sven Axelsson wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2020 at 21:59, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>
>> Interesting, the brew formula uses the pre-built binaries which are 32-
>> bit only (due to licensing issues, see below):
>> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/blob/HEAD/Casks/li
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 00:26, Phil Holmes wrote:
> We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.23.0. This is a
> development version, but these are usually reliable. If you want to use the
> latest stable version of LilyPond, we recommend using the 2.20.0 version.
>
> --
> Phil Holmes
Hello Daniel,
GNU LilyPond is published under the GNU General Public License. I would suggest
reading through [https://lilypond.org/gpl.html](http://lilypond.org/gpl.html)
to understand what that entails. http://lilypond.org/gpl.html
Best wishes,
Jahrme
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 22:00, Daniel Xu
Hello all,
I was catching up on the blog posts for GNU Guix, and I thought that one in
particular might be interesting to some members of the LilyPond community.
There was a post about music production on a Guix system that utilized
LilyPond. The process integrated usage of both the PDF and MID
for inspection.
Also, I have been exploring adding 64-bit macOS (Darwin) targets and I am
planning on sharing my findings thus far as soon as I have finished writing
them up.
- Jahrme Risner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
ht
I want to preemptively apologize for the length of this email and give a TL;DR.
-
TL;DR
I have been working on building a 64-bit macOS (x86_64-apple-darwin) release.
One option for build LilyPond for 64-bit macOS is Hom
Hello all,
I recently saw that Andy Wingo (the primary maintainer of Guile) gave a talk
about the upcoming release of Guile 3 (projected for “Spring 2019”).
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/news/
https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/guile3fasterprograms/
Currently version 2.9.1 is serving a
Hello Marnen,
Thank you for your input; as one of the people who has been working to get
64-bit Darwin binaries built I can say that more help to get things working
is always a good thing.
I have inserted replies below to some of your comments, though they seem
to have continued growing far past
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 15:39, David Kastrup wrote
> You would not be allowed to execute GUB on non-MacOSX hardware if using
> Xcode were an integral part of its operation, and this kind of
> restriction is not allowed by the GPLv3.
The way I had been approaching an addition of 64-bit Darwin to
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 08:14, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> You mean a stand-alone package that can be easily distributed,
>>> right? Since MacPorts does provide a 64bit version with the
>>> `lilypond-devel' package.
>>
>> Yes, thanks for the correction. The easiest way right now will
>> probably be
> I'm the maintainer of the Portfile of `lilypond-devel'. Please send
> patches to me. And please send more generic questions to
>
> macports-us...@lists.macports.org ;
>
> the people on the list are quite responsive usually.
Would it be better to email the “users” list about something like settin
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 06:36, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 2:38 PM Marnen Laibow-Koser
> wrote:
>
> I’ve been playing around with the MacStadium environment and understanding
> more about the build. Here’s what I think I know so far. Please correct
> me if I’m wrong on an
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 19:08, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> Awesome, thanks; I’ll try it when I get a chance. I still want to get an .app
> bundle built, but it’s good to know that the mdmg approach actually works as
> advertised. :)
If you would like to see for yourself how the MacPorts build
On 2020-01-08 at 15:00, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
> GitHub is putting our eggs in Microsoft's basket. Not too enthused about that
> idea. If I remember correctly, GitLab had some size restrictions that clearly
> are not going to fly with LilyPond.
I am not aware of what size limits LilyPo
Hello all,
I recently moved my primary system onto GNU Guix and have been getting it set
up according. While doing that I noticed that the Guix package for LilyPond is
still on 2.20.0, seemingly having missed the entire 2.22.0 release cycle, and
so I'm now looking at updating Guix's package def
Thank you Jean for sharing your perspective. I’ll continue on at least for now
with just overriding `out` within make to appease the build.
Thank you David for sharing that recollection. While an infrequent poster on
the list I am a fairly avid lurker who enjoys seeing the occasional tales about
Hi Ben,
It looks like both MacPorts and Homebrew (linked from
https://lilypond.org/download.html) have LilyPond working with ARM Macs (which
is what an M1 Mac would be) so if you already use either of those it should be
quite easy to add LilyPond.
If you haven’t used either package manager bef
20 matches
Mail list logo
