LilyPond 2.20 release process

2016-12-31 Thread David Kastrup
In order to properly wrap up my maintainership of LilyPond, I would like to make sure that LilyPond 2.20 is released in an orderly manner. Work that does not appear to make sense to include in 2.20.1: a) Guile 2.0 support in release-quality manner and enabled by default. However, in order to inc

Re: LilyPond 2.20 release process

2016-12-31 Thread Phil Holmes
I think there are a few bugs that need attention prior to stable release. https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4975/ is one I'm aware of, and there are a number of ones marked as critical. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: "David Kastrup" To: Sent: Saturday, De

Re: LilyPond 2.20 release process

2016-12-31 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > I think there are a few bugs that need attention prior to stable > release. https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4975/ is one > I'm aware of, and there are a number of ones marked as critical. Sounds like something that might be addressed by a compiler update i

Re: Free alternatives to Rietveld?

2016-12-31 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
You could switch to Gerrit for code review. It is a native git tool, so it needs less awkward scripts. There are some hosted providers (such as gerrithub), or you can run your own version of Gerrit if you have inclination to set it up. Setting up your own account authentication infrastructure is p

Re: Allow fixed spacing of symbols in church rests (issue 319910043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

2016-12-31 Thread david . nalesnik
Please see http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg117437.html https://codereview.appspot.com/319910043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

OLL features (was: LilyPond 2.20 release process)

2016-12-31 Thread Urs Liska
Hi all, Am 31.12.2016 um 10:31 schrieb David Kastrup: > I would urge the openlilylib > crew to assess their current work and see whether they consider any > parts suitably stable and robust and useful to include in the next > release. I see three items in openLilyLib that I would like to discuss

Re: LilyPond 2.20 release process

2016-12-31 Thread Trevor Daniels
Phil Holmes wrote Saturday, December 31, 2016 11:03 AM >I think there are a few bugs that need attention prior to stable release. > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4975/ is one I'm aware of, > and there are a number of ones marked as critical. There are four bugs marked as cri

Re: Allow fixed spacing of symbols in church rests (issue 319910043 by david.nales...@gmail.com)

2016-12-31 Thread nine . fierce . ballads
On 2016/12/31 17:22:56, david.nalesnik wrote: Please see http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg117437.html I believe I've done my part in raising the question about defaults. I'll leave the decision to the more informed. https://codereview.appspot.com/319910043/ ___