Phil Holmes wrote Saturday, December 31, 2016 11:03 AM
>I think there are a few bugs that need attention prior to stable release. > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4975/ is one I'm aware of, > and there are a number of ones marked as critical. There are four bugs marked as critical regressions, see: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/search/?q=%28_type%3ACritical+OR+labels%3ARegression%29+AND+%28status%3ANew+OR+status%3AAccepted+OR+status%3AStarted%29 It seems the sources of these bugs have been traced to patches submitted by devs who are no longer active: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4807/ Keith O'Hara https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4751/ John Gourlay https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/4182/ Janek Warchol https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3778/ Mike Solomon The patches are all large and quite far-reaching, so reversion is not an option. Debugging has been attempted and (so far) abandoned. So it is not clear what should be done. Discuss. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
