This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
bottom, assignments should be more like
1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/
Am 27. Oktober 2016 04:40:14 GMT-07:00, schrieb David Kastrup :
>
>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>
>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>
>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>
>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>
>>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>>
>>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>>
>>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>>
>>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>>bottom, assignments should be more like
>>
>>1/2, 3/1/2, 3/
Am 2016-10-27 13:40, schrieb David Kastrup:
while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
bottom, assignments should be more like
1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ...
namely keeping the small voice numbers for the inner voices.
Are you sure? I always understoo
Werner LEMBERG writes:
>>>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>>>
>>>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>>>
>>>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>>>
>>>while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>>>bottom, assignments should
On 10/27/16 6:18 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Urs Liska"
wrote:
>
>
>Am 27. Oktober 2016 04:40:14 GMT-07:00, schrieb David Kastrup
>:
>>
>>This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>>
>>If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>>
>>1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/
David Kastrup writes:
> Werner LEMBERG writes:
>
This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top
lilyp...@maltemeyn.de writes:
> Am 2016-10-27 13:40, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
>> bottom, assignments should be more like
>>
>> 1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ...
>>
>> namely keeping the small voice numbers for the i
> Werner, that does not even make sense. [...]
Ok, I completely misunderstood you, sorry.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2016/10/26 15:16:27, lemzwerg wrote:
> Our checks can detect old URW fonts.
> Current URW fonts cannot be detect.
Hmm, fontconfig collects information on a font's supported Unicode
blocks while
adding it to the database. If we check that the URW fonts are not
Filippov's,
but still supp
Other version of URW fonts do not seem to have OTF format.
The link you are showing points to a directory where the fonts come in
all three flavours.
C059-BdIta.otf
... in the ghostscript-9.20.tar.gz bundle the URW fonts don't have an
extension and are still in Type1 format.
It's not clear
LGTM now, thanks!
https://codereview.appspot.com/313930043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
David,
Since starting Lilypond I have become accustomed to the order presented in
the manual (2.18.2) that states:
Voice 1: highest
Voice 2: lowest
Voice 3: second highest
Voice 4: second lowest
Voice 5: third highest
Voice 6: third lowest.
This arrangement is useful for my setting idiosyncratic
On Oct 27, 2016, at 09:54 , David Kastrup wrote:
>
> << \context Voice = "1" \with \voiceThree ...
> \context Voice = "2" \with \voiceOne ...
> \context Voice = "3" \with \voiceTwo ...
> \context Voice = "4" \with \voiceFour ...
I’m not sure whether this thread has progressed beyond the ne
2016-10-27 13:40 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
>
> This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >>
>
> If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order:
>
> 1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ...
>
> while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to
> bottom, assignment
15 matches
Mail list logo