- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Kobel"
To: "Phil Holmes" ;
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: Fun with upgrades - not
Hi Phil,
I had a bit of trouble to parse your setup description. IIUC, you used to
have a machine with
- Ubuntu 10.04 running natively as h
Hello,
I have tried the same idea with context properties, and it seems to
work just as well as my previous approach with a static member. (To
summarize: cross voice spanners and the voice they currently belong to
are stored in a property of some context containing both voices, like
Score. Each vo
Nathan Chou writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have tried the same idea with context properties, and it seems to
> work just as well as my previous approach with a static member. (To
> summarize: cross voice spanners and the voice they currently belong to
> are stored in a property of some context containing
Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>> > to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
>> > spanner's information is shared (although I am not sure how that would
>> > be done with a key-list, si
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>>> > to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
>>> > spanner's information is shared (although I am not sure how that would
>>> > be
Am 30.06.2016 um 14:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
> to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
> spanner's information is sh
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>> to optionally specify the parent context in which a cross-voice
>> s
Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> Urs Liska writes:
>>>
Am 30.06.2016 um 11:52 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> There is a detail I would like to clarify. David suggested allowing \=
>>> to optionally s
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>
>> How does that differ from symbols?
>
> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
> LilyPond code, isn't it?
Can you give an example for symbols "entered as LilyPond code" as
opposed to "in the Sch
Am 30.06.2016 um 14:47 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska writes:
>
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>>> How does that differ from symbols?
>> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
>> LilyPond code, isn't it?
> Can you give an example for symbo
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:47 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>>
How does that differ from symbols?
>>> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
>>> LilyPond code, isn't it?
>> Can y
Hi folks
I'm trying to build lilypond with GUB following the instructions in:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/notes-on-builds-with-gub
`make bootstrap` was successful, but `make lilypond` is causing an
error (full log attached).
I'm running Debian stable 64-bit (both O
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
July 31st
A quick synopsis of all patches currently in the review process can be
found here:
http://philholmes.net/lilypond/allura/
__
Push:
4904 Reimplement issue 4781 for musicxml2ly more literally. -
Hi folks,
it would appear that the graphics card on my laptop died on me. After
an hour of black screen, it now managed to shut down and reboot in some
low-resolution mode. I don't know how often I'll manage that however.
I'll likely need to take this one apart and look for loose connectors
and
David Kastrup writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> it would appear that the graphics card on my laptop died on me. After
> an hour of black screen, it now managed to shut down and reboot in some
> low-resolution mode. I don't know how often I'll manage that however.
> I'll likely need to take this one apart
15 matches
Mail list logo
