Hi,
you might have been wondering what I've been up to in the last month or
so. I have by now accumulated several rewrites of the
"dispatcher"/"listener"-related internals of
engravers/performers/translators and got them working. Unfortunately,
by the time I finish one rewrite, I have learnt en
[1][macupdate-logo.png]
top background
App Listing Updated
Hi lilypond.org, We have updated your application listing for LilyPond
2.19.19-1 on [2]MacUpdate.com. Please take a moment to review your
a
Patch counted down - please push
https://codereview.appspot.com/232850043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
Here is the current patch countdown list. The next countdown will be on
April 30th.
You can always view the most current countdown list here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=Patch%3Apush%2Ccountdown%2Creview%2Cnew%2Cwaiting&colspec=Patch%20Owner%20ID%20Summary&sort=patch
All,
I've seen lately a handful of users using (and suggesting to others) the
single underscore "_" syntax to skip syllables in lyrics instead of "\skip
X", which I think is a mistake when it's obvious they did not intend to
make a melisma. It works, except the lyrics get left-aligned to the first
Abraham Lee wrote Monday, April 27, 2015 5:39 PM
> I've seen lately a handful of users using (and suggesting to others) the
> single underscore "_" syntax to skip syllables in lyrics instead of "\skip
> X", which I think is a mistake when it's obvious they did not intend to
> make a melisma. It w
Trevor,
Thanks for your reply.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Trevor Daniels [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n175497...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> Abraham Lee wrote Monday, April 27, 2015 5:39 PM
>
> > I've seen lately a handful of users using (and suggesting to others) the
> > single undersc
Hello everyone :-)
I'd like to "officially announce" that I'm active again. I will
probably start by focusing on Contributor's Guide, trying to make it
easier for new people to get involved with the project. I already
have a few ideas regarding LilyDev.
cheers,
Janek
PS and i'll be delighted t
In another project that I am working on they use the gitflow branching
model.
It seems to be quite robust in terms of
a: Freezing features for release while at the same time providing a means
of working on new features.
b: Providing formal methods for getting critical bug fixes into both the
rel
2015-04-27 22:46 GMT+02:00 Janek Warchoł :
> Hello everyone :-)
>
> I'd like to "officially announce" that I'm active again. I will
> probably start by focusing on Contributor's Guide, trying to make it
> easier for new people to get involved with the project. I already
> have a few ideas regardi
Hi David,
just to let this not go uncommented. Although not understanding it
completely this looks like a significant step forward - and a
significant amount of work. Thank you for working on the foundations.
Urs
Am 27.04.2015 um 11:09 schrieb David Kastrup:
Hi,
you might have been wonderi
On 4/27/15 3:09 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>As things currently stand, I suspect that the current mechanism for
>creating Scheme engravers with their own variables (namely providing a
>function creating an engraver description) does not have likable
>performance characteristics and, more import
I'd like to second everything that Carl writes below,
and add my thanks to you, David.
Trevor
Carl Sorensen wrote Monday, April 27, 2015 11:07 PM
> On 4/27/15 3:09 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>As things currently stand, I suspect that the current mechanism for
>>creating Scheme engravers wit
2015-04-28 0:20 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels :
> I'd like to second everything that Carl writes below,
me too!
(and I thought writing some hundreds lines of new code in my recent
patch would have been a lot of work. Looks like I'm playing in a
sandbox ...) lol
> and add my thanks to you, David.
+1
14 matches
Mail list logo
