Hans Aberg writes:
>> On 6 Nov 2014, at 21:42, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Hans Aberg writes:
>
>>> You wanted \compoundMeter to be numeric, so I gave a possible
>>> algorithmic structure, reiterating discussions of the past on LilyPond
>>> lists. Once one has that, the time signature derives f
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 10:08, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Aberg writes:
>
>>> On 6 Nov 2014, at 21:42, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Hans Aberg writes:
>>
You wanted \compoundMeter to be numeric, so I gave a possible
algorithmic structure, reiterating discussions of the past on Lil
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 00:37, Dan Eble wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2014, at 08:46 , David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> I lean towards not consulting the style here. \compoundMeter to me
>> feels like it should just be numeric.
>>
>> Of course, to allow for full laziness, it might make sense to interpret
>>
>
There has been discussion every now and then about ways to include files
only once, with different suggestions but no final outcome (IIRC).
I would like to re-raise the issue with a slightly different perspective.
I think one thing LilyPond could use is encouraging people to use
*libraries*.
O
Hans Aberg writes:
>> On 7 Nov 2014, at 10:08, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> The question was when to use 4/4 and when to use C in a time
>> signature. This is not related to the accent structure of the music
>> as much as it is to the century of its origin and the conventions
>> used in its respec
Urs Liska writes:
> \import harmonic-analysis
> would load everything at once (I'd even suggest this command working
> with symbolic names and not filenames).
>
> \importFrom harmonic-analysis #'(pitch-class riemann)
> would only load the two submodules.
> (The submodule would have to \import the
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 11:38, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Aberg writes:
>
>>> On 7 Nov 2014, at 10:08, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> The question was when to use 4/4 and when to use C in a time
>>> signature. This is not related to the accent structure of the music
>>> as much as it is to the
Reviewers: ,
Description:
Fix trill timing in articulate.ly
Used a fixed duration for the "twiddletime" instead of the broken
heuristic
that was used before.
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/173750043/
Affected files (+3, -5 lines):
M ly/articulate.ly
Index: ly/articula
On 2014/11/06 05:44:50, Keith wrote:
Changing the current global variable 'partcombine-chord-range' will
not become
the user interface.
All I meant for that variable was to avoid repeating the same magic
numbers three times. Is there a more idiomatic way to do that in
Scheme? Should I have
Hans Aberg writes:
>> On 7 Nov 2014, at 11:38, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Hans Aberg writes:
>>
On 7 Nov 2014, at 10:08, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
The question was when to use 4/4 and when to use C in a time
signature. This is not related to the accent structure of the music
On Nov 7, 2014, at 01:46 , David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Dan Eble writes:
>
>> If both \compoundMeter #(2 3 8) and \compoundMeter 4/4 could be made
>> to work, why bother keeping both \compoundMeter and \time? Why not
>> just let \time do all the work?
>
> Because of
>
> \time #'(2 3 2) #'(8 8)
>
It's a bit presumptuous of me to comment on code I know little about,
but it occurs to me that if it were that simple, it probably would have
been done that way in the first place.
Can you go into some detail about the nature of the problem? What case
was failing for you and how is your version
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 13:45, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Hans Aberg writes:
>
>>> On 7 Nov 2014, at 11:38, David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Hans Aberg writes:
>>>
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 10:08, David Kastrup wrote:
> The question was when to use 4/4 and when to use C in a time
> sign
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 13:55, Dan Eble wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 01:46 , David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Dan Eble writes:
>>
>>> If both \compoundMeter #(2 3 8) and \compoundMeter 4/4 could be made
>>> to work, why bother keeping both \compoundMeter and \time? Why not
>>> just let \time do all
Dan Eble writes:
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 01:46 , David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Dan Eble writes:
>>
>>> If both \compoundMeter #(2 3 8) and \compoundMeter 4/4 could be made
>>> to work, why bother keeping both \compoundMeter and \time? Why not
>>> just let \time do all the work?
>>
>> Because of
>
> On 7 Nov 2014, at 14:39, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Dan Eble writes:
>
>> On Nov 7, 2014, at 01:46 , David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan Eble writes:
>>>
If both \compoundMeter #(2 3 8) and \compoundMeter 4/4 could be made
to work, why bother keeping both \compoundMeter and \time?
Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
\import harmonic-analysis
would load everything at once (I'd even suggest this command working
with symbolic names and not filenames).
\importFrom harmonic-analysis #'(pitch-class riemann)
would only load the two submodules.
(The
Am 07.11.2014 18:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond,
What do you mean by this?
Do you suggest to implement a module approach that is somewhat
parallel to Scheme's use-module ap
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond,
>
> What do you mean by this?
> Do you suggest to implement a module approach that is somewhat
> parallel to Scheme's use-module approach?
No, more likely an approach
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 07.11.2014 18:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond,
>>> What do you mean by this?
>>> Do you suggest to implement a module approach that is somew
I’m having trouble figuring out how to make this function fall back on another
time signature style (make-simple-numbered-time-signature-markup fraction) if
the requested glyph is not present.
(define-public (make-glyph-time-signature-markup style fraction)
(make-musicglyph-markup (string-ap
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 20:04 , Dan Eble wrote:
>
> I’m having trouble figuring out how to make this function fall back on
> another time signature style (make-simple-numbered-time-signature-markup
> fraction) if the requested glyph is not present.
>
> (define-public (make-glyph-time-signature-m
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 04:37:41 -0800, wrote:
On 2014/11/06 05:44:50, Keith wrote:
Changing the current global variable 'partcombine-chord-range' will
not become
the user interface.
All I meant for that variable was to avoid repeating the same magic
numbers three times. Is there a more idiom
23 matches
Mail list logo
