Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup: >> What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond, > > What do you mean by this? > Do you suggest to implement a module approach that is somewhat > parallel to Scheme's use-module approach?
No, more likely an approach that is a good wrapper around use-module. > Or rather try to "package" a module approach in Scheme modules somehow? > My impression is that defining and loading modules should be simpler > than defining (and to some extent using) Scheme modules. At least > there should be some syntactic sugar so one can use a "\" command to > import a library. I agree with that. Unless we have additional functionality we need to wrap, however, we likely do not need to avoid Scheme for _exporting_ a library: the expected minimal skill levels of library providers are higher than those of library users. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
