Hi,
Some time ago we were discussing what percentage of slurs in LilyPond
need shaping:
2013/10/18 David Kastrup :
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> \shape is an awesome function, indispensable for creating
>> publication-quality slurs. However, after using it 1107 times in a
>> recent
2014/1/10 Urs Liska :
>
> Well,
> compiling a few measures of a single staff feels nearly instantaneous, and
> when you're editing an orchestral score this makes a huge difference.
>
> Generally I'd think it would be a good idea to have such an interface in
> Frescobaldi.
I know that this is not
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2014/1/10 Urs Liska :
>>
>> Well,
>> compiling a few measures of a single staff feels nearly instantaneous, and
>> when you're editing an orchestral score this makes a huge difference.
>>
>> Generally I'd think it would be a good idea to have such an interface in
>> Fresco
https://codereview.appspot.com/50530044/diff/1/Documentation/learning/templates.itely
File Documentation/learning/templates.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/50530044/diff/1/Documentation/learning/templates.itely#newcode11
Documentation/learning/templates.itely:11: @c \version "2.19.
On Jan 10, 2014, at 11:41 PM, "Paul Morris" wrote:
> Seems like getting just the notes (not layout) out of an
> imported musicXML file should be an easy and straightforward thing, but I
> guess not?
>
I can't speak for Carl P's work. For me, effective LP input files require
structure (vari
Hi Janek,
Thank you for all your continuing and wonderful work on curves in particular,
and Lilypond in general!
1. Would you consider putting all your tweaks and shortcuts in a file — on
GitHub, maybe? ;) — so that we can all benefit from your expertise?
2. When might HDLCCO (the "highly-desi
Reviewers: dak,
Message:
Changed to 2.18.0 and pushed to staging as
220298a9a1dcd1c318a38d79aa3a5ea694a17270
Closing ...
Description:
Issue 3796: Doc: Bump version number
The version number of this file should have been increased
to 2.19.0 when patch 22ea3eb6b78a50784ae02c3f29060e1c093262a4
2014/1/11 David Kastrup :
> One very nice integrated experience is offered by preview-latex
> http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/preview-latex>.
Indeed, this is very nice. Although i haven't used it, i know i would
enjoy it :)
j
___
lilypond-devel ma
Janek Warchoł writes:
> 2014/1/11 David Kastrup :
>> One very nice integrated experience is offered by preview-latex
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/preview-latex>.
>
>
> Indeed, this is very nice. Although i haven't used it, i know i would
> enjoy it :)
Well, actually it's a lot better t
Am Donnerstag, den 09.01.2014, 10:13 -0500 schrieb Carl Peterson:
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:20 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
> > that strongly penalizes manual tweaks. Graphically/manually oriented
> > workflows detract from the
Do you want me to make a patch for the old way that can be applied to
2.18.1?
https://codereview.appspot.com/50790043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Carl Sorensen-3 wrote
> I can't speak for Carl P's work. For me, effective LP input files require
> structure (variables, contexts) that MusicXML knows nothing of. And it's
> generally easier to create them than to fix them on import.
I see what you mean. Unfortunately it makes it harder to use
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Paul Morris wrote:
> Carl Sorensen-3 wrote
> > I can't speak for Carl P's work. For me, effective LP input files
> require
> > structure (variables, contexts) that MusicXML knows nothing of. And it's
> > generally easier to create them than to fix them on import
Folks,
the German Wikipedia entry of LilyPond at
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/LilyPond
shows a few bars of a Stockhausen piano piece. Unfortunately, it's of
bad quality: it contains input errors (cf. the plain text `pp'), the
typesetting of the score itself, and its conversion to SVG (resp
Hello
The following patches have been at 'please push' for the last 3
countdowns (i.e. over 9 days), and I am not seeing anything obvious that
leads me to believe that their is 'Needs Work' on them. I am seeing
recent emails from them on the lists and so assume they would also be
getting the
Reviewers: carl.d.sorensen_gmail.com,
Message:
On 2014/01/12 03:59:20, Carl wrote:
Do you want me to make a patch for the old way that can be applied to
2.18.1?
I think I'll be able to insert the necessary 4 characters myself... But
thanks for the offer.
Description:
Issue 3798: Bad beam exc
16 matches
Mail list logo
