PATCHES: Countdown for January 6th - 06:00 GMT

Hello (and Happy New Year), 3762

Re: Suggestion about input languages

On 03/01/14 00:07, Noeck wrote: Dear developers, [tl;dr: how about ISO language codes for input language selection?] some time ago, I suggested to add French ("français") to the list of note-name languages as an alias to "italiano". This is the current state, "español" was also added. The disc

Re: Content of "Introduction"->"Our Goal"

On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 06:03:01PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote: > I see the need to modify the "Our Goal" box on "Introduction", but I > wouldn't want to do that on my own because it would feel like > modifying someone else's tune instead of only adding a figured bass > to it. I have no objection to an

Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely?

Apparently, from LilyPond 2.13 on, no GA code was added to track conversions. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Phil Holmes wrote: > - Original Message - From: "Trevor Daniels" > To: "David Kastrup" ; > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 3:37 PM > Subject: Re: Announcing 2.18.0 widely? > >>

Re: contributing instructions are misleading!

On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 07:45:15PM +, James wrote: > If you are comfortable with making patches and compiling, LilyDev is > probably not for you. If you are not or want a ready-to-go > environment and don't care that it's on some 'old' Linux release > (i.e. not new and shiny) then LilyDev is pe

Re: contributing instructions are misleading!

On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 03:47:32PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > 2014/1/1 Graham Percival : > > Not quite. 1) is obvious, but equally important is 1.5) update > > incorrect info. Remember this latest iteration of interest in the > > CG happened because one or two new contributors tried to follow

Re: contributing instructions are misleading!

Zitat von Graham Percival : On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 07:45:15PM +, James wrote: If you are comfortable with making patches and compiling, LilyDev is probably not for you. If you are not or want a ready-to-go environment and don't care that it's on some 'old' Linux release (i.e. not new and

Re: Content of "Introduction"->"Our Goal"

Zitat von Graham Percival : On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 06:03:01PM +0100, Urs Liska wrote: I see the need to modify the "Our Goal" box on "Introduction", but I wouldn't want to do that on my own because it would feel like modifying someone else's tune instead of only adding a figured bass to it.

Images on "Introduction" and "Features"

The images in the first text boxes on "Introduction" and "Features" are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? If not I would suggest to replace one of them with something else. IMHO the 'flat-design.png' is much more suitable for "Features". On "Introduction" we're talking about

Re: Images on "Introduction" and "Features"

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: > > The images in the first text boxes on "Introduction" and "Features" > are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new website. It makes sense to use dif

Re: Images on "Introduction" and "Features"

Graham Percival schrieb: >On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: >> >> The images in the first text boxes on "Introduction" and "Features" >> are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? > >nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new >

Re: Images on "Introduction" and "Features"

Graham Percival schrieb: >On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 02:49:35PM +0100, u...@openlilylib.org wrote: >> >> The images in the first text boxes on "Introduction" and "Features" >> are the same. Is there any specific reason for this? > >nah, I was just copying material from the old website to the new >

Re: Doc: NR 2.4.1 - add Hammer/Pull snippets (issue 46730043)

LGTM Thank you James! https://codereview.appspot.com/46730043/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

when is 2.19 going to be released?

Hello all, Now that 2.18 has been released (kudos, by the way!!!), when is the unstable branch going to be updated? I like to be on the bleeding edge… ;) Thanks, Kieren. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mail

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

- Original Message - From: "Kieren MacMillan" To: "Lilypond-User Mailing List" Cc: "Lilypond Dev" Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 4:24 PM Subject: when is 2.19 going to be released? Hello all, Now that 2.18 has been released (kudos, by the way!!!), when is the unstable branch going

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

Hi Phil, > Well, you need to compile your own version then :-) I have VirtualBox and Lilybuntu and Janek’s script installed. The problem is, there are 437.5 “versions of Lilypond" in git, and I don’t know which I should compile. :-p > Unless anyone complains, probably this weekend. Thanks. =

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

Kieren MacMillan schrieb: >Hello all, > >Now that 2.18 has been released (kudos, by the way!!!), when is the >unstable branch going to be updated? >I like to be on the bleeding edge… ;) Then you should build your own LilyPonds ;-) -- Urs Liska openlilylib.org __

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

Kieren MacMillan schrieb: >Hi Phil, > >> Well, you need to compile your own version then :-) > >I have VirtualBox and Lilybuntu and Janek’s script installed. >The problem is, there are 437.5 “versions of Lilypond" in git, and I >don’t know which I should compile. :-p As long as you don't want

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hello all, > > Now that 2.18 has been released (kudos, by the way!!!), when is the > unstable branch going to be updated? What do you mean, "updated"? There are a lot of changes in the unstable branch already. -- David Kastrup __

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi Phil, > >> Well, you need to compile your own version then :-) > > I have VirtualBox and Lilybuntu and Janek’s script installed. > The problem is, there are 437.5 “versions of Lilypond" in git, and I > don’t know which I should compile. :-p Verified bleeding edge i

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

On 1/3/14 9:26 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote: >Kieren MacMillan writes: > >> Hello all, >> >> Now that 2.18 has been released (kudos, by the way!!!), when is the >> unstable branch going to be updated? > >What do you mean, "updated"? There are a lot of changes in the unstable >branch already. I be

Re: when is 2.19 going to be released?

> I believe that the question might be better stated as > "When will a new development release be made?” Yes. That. =) Thanks, Kieren. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Your app listing has been updated on MacUpdate.com

Hi lilypond.org, We have updated your application listing for LilyPond 2.18.0-1 on MacUpdate.com. Please take a moment to review your application's information to make sure that everything is correct. You may view your updated listing by visiting: https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/19024/lilypon

Re: Create Score context before starting iteration. (issue 44860045)

David Kastrup wrote: > https://codereview.appspot.com/44860045/diff/60001/input/regression/initial-contexts.ly#newcode10 > input/regression/initial-contexts.ly:10: %%and iteration can't skip time > without it. > This comment is a bit of a non-sequitur: time is kept in the Global > context, so it co

Re: Create Score context before starting iteration. (issue 44860045)

On 2014/01/03 19:07:55, Devon Schudy wrote: David Kastrup wrote: > https://codereview.appspot.com/44860045/diff/60001/input/regression/initial-contexts.ly#newcode10 > input/regression/initial-contexts.ly:10: %%and iteration can't skip time > without it. > This comment is a bit of a non-sequi

License of files in Documentation/pictures and ability to distribute them unclear

There are a lot of files in Documentation/pictures which have no clear license, and unfortunately, the git log for them isn't clear at all either. Some of them cannot be distributed by lilypond either, for example, logo-debian.png is the Debian Restricted Use Logo.[1] It's great that a lot of the

Accidental no longer clashes with TupletNumber or TupletBracket (issue 45520044)

Hi Mike, LGTM, after a visual check, but just some suggestions re the comments you've added. Cheers, Ian https://codereview.appspot.com/45520044/diff/1/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc File lily/tuplet-bracket.cc (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/45520044/diff/1/lily/tuplet-bracket.cc#newcode667 li