Zitat von Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 07:45:15PM +0000, James wrote:
If you are comfortable with making patches and compiling, LilyDev is
probably not for you. If you are not or want a ready-to-go
environment and don't care that it's on some 'old' Linux release
(i.e. not new and shiny) then LilyDev is perfectly fine.
Agreed. Urs: if you didn't get that impression from reading the
CG, then could you suggest somewhere to add something to that
effect (or maybe just copy James' comment literally) ? We don't
actually want to discourage experienced linux users from using
their native environment; like you, I would find it a bit
insulting if a project really did claim that I wasn't able to set
up my own devel environment. That said, we want to make it
absolutely clear that sorting out the potentially-complicated
build dependencies is not *required* from contributors.
Cheers,
- Graham
I'll give it a shot ASAP. Probably it's only an issue of two or three
tiny rewordings, just to give the right *impression*.
I think I'm quite clear about how it should be.
Unfortunately I'm suffering from Holiday's Disease. That is, as long
as the children and particularly my wife are at home I don't have
access to a Linux box or in general to a computer with more than 10
minutes of coherent concentration ;-)
Any activity that relies on either of these conditions has to wait
until next week. And I have to admit that LilyPond
documentation/website isn't absolutely on the top of the list.
Best
Urs
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
