Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Urs Liska
Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup: Graham Percival writes: On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: What's wrong with GitHub, anyway? It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to be a target for attacks), has its own "terms of service", ma

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread David Kastrup
Urs Liska writes: > Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup: >> Graham Percival writes: >> >>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:49:42AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > What's wrong with GitHub, anyway? It requires separate accounts and credentials (much more likely to be a target for at

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" To: "David Kastrup" Cc: "Julien Rioux" ; "LilyPond Developmet Team" ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys" Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 1:57 PM Subject: Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup: Graham P

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/22 Phil Holmes : > IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev (possibly > in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl. Git allows a developer to > create a patch with 2 commands: git commit and git format-patch. That can > be uploaded to Rietveld with a single comm

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/22 Janek Warchoł : > 2013/9/22 Phil Holmes : >> IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev (possibly >> in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl. Git allows a developer to >> create a patch with 2 commands: git commit and git format-patch. That can >> be uploade

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Janek Warchoł" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "Urs Liska" ; "David Kastrup" ; "Julien Rioux" ; "LilyPond Developmet Team" ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys" Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 4:30 PM Subject: Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub 2013/9/22 Phil Hol

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > From: "Urs Liska" > >> Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup: >> >>> So the question is what we should be telling the Savannah operators >>> to make working on GNU projects using Git more feasible. >>> >> What about asking them to provide Gerrit as a service? >> >>

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread David Kastrup
"Phil Holmes" writes: > - Original Message - > From: "Janek Warchoł" > To: "Phil Holmes" > Cc: "Urs Liska" ; "David Kastrup" ; > "Julien Rioux" ; "LilyPond Developmet Team" > ; "Han-Wen Nienhuys" > Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 4:30 PM > Subject: Re: we now have "lilypond" organiza

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Federico Bruni
2013/9/18 David Kastrup > Translation workflows don't use our > review system or issue trackers. > > And I don't even think they would benefit from it. If we take a look at > the few reasonably tightly tracked translations (French and Spanish, I > think), I very much doubt that you'd improve the

Stop \lyricmode { \skip 1.*3 } from failing. (issue 13256053)

2013-09-22 Thread vikreykja
I think a patch like this requires at least one regression test. https://codereview.appspot.com/13256053/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Janek Warchoł
2013/9/22 David Kastrup : > "Phil Holmes" writes: >> IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev >> (possibly in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl. Git allows a >> developer to create a patch with 2 commands: git commit and git >> format-patch. That can be uploaded

what happened to lilynet?

2013-09-22 Thread Janek Warchoł
When i go to http://lilynet.net/, i see Fedora Test Page This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it means that the web server installed at this site is working properly, but has not yet been configured It's l

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:57:42PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup: > >So the question is what we should be telling the Savannah operators to > >make working on GNU projects using Git more feasible. > > > What about asking them to provide Gerrit as a service?

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 05:30:04PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote: > 2013/9/22 Phil Holmes : > > IMHO this is solving a problem that doesn't exist. Using LilyDev (possibly > > in a Virtual Machine) provides git and git-cl. > > > > How hard is that? > > Hard. Good. (aside: note that my email about ge

Re: we now have "lilypond" organization on GitHub

2013-09-22 Thread Urs Liska
Am 23.09.2013 02:55, schrieb Graham Percival: On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:57:42PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote: Am 16.09.2013 12:50, schrieb David Kastrup: So the question is what we should be telling the Savannah operators to make working on GNU projects using Git more feasible. What about asking t

Re: Stop \lyricmode { \skip 1.*3 } from failing. (issue 13256053)

2013-09-22 Thread dak
Reviewers: Vik Reykja, Message: On 2013/09/22 22:30:51, Vik Reykja wrote: I think a patch like this requires at least one regression test. Well, actually the original lexer.ll patch would more likely have called for a regression test as it covers a lot more change. Would you want to propose o