On 2012/04/27 15:01:23, mike7 wrote:
I think the problem is that it tries to do a blanket copy of
everything from the
misc directory into the target directory, but if the build is not in a
separate
build directory, then there will be "out/" in misc, which is a
directory.
Sounds like it coul
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:14:23AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Then we'll have hard numbers on which developers are abusing the
> > process. I mean, sure, we all know whose patches tend to be great
> > and whose patches tend to be problematic... but a completely
>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:26:16AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>
> On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> >> I'd be good to set a precedent for this now so that LilyPond can apply
> >> to other soft
Given how things are going, it's past time that we have somebody
else that can make releases. Who's interested in learning?
Requirements:
- powerful computer
- can already compile GUB from scratch
- is well known to lilypond developers (say, at least 1 year of
lilypond development)
- familiar w
On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 08:26:16AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>>
>> On 27 avr. 2012, at 08:07, Graham Percival wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:09:39AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I'd be good to set a precedent for th
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
> > answer about this specific case? I guess the general consensus is
> > "go ahead and we'll figure it
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:14:23AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Then we'll have hard numbers on which developers are abusing the
>> > process. I mean, sure, we all know whose patches tend to be great
>> > and whose patches tend to be
On 28 avr. 2012, at 10:13, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
>>> answer about this specific case? I guess the
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:13:50AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> In fact, if you have to
> do half a dozen of iterations before getting things actually right on
> the somewhat more than superficial level provided by our tests, you'll
> have gained lots of good Karma on the road.
I was thinking tha
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:13:50AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> In fact, if you have to
>> do half a dozen of iterations before getting things actually right on
>> the somewhat more than superficial level provided by our tests, you'll
>> have gained lots of good Karma
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To:
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 8:21 AM
Subject: assistant release manger
Given how things are going, it's past time that we have somebody
else that can make releases. Who's interested in learning?
Requirements:
- powerful computer
-
Hello,
On 28 April 2012 10:59, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>
> To:
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 8:21 AM
> Subject: assistant release manger
>> Given how things are going, it's past time that we have somebody
>> else that can make releases. Who
Hi all,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> There's an unexpected problem: i caught some virus and i'm getting
> ill. It's too early to say whether i'll be able to do some serious
> work in the next week or i'll have to stay in bed, which is extremely
> unfortunate since i ha
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I like the content of the announcement.
>
> I still don't like the idea of manually editing index.html. I was
> expecting/hoping for something like
>
> Documentation/web/twits.txt:
> -
> The Ensemble 101 is going on a European tour whe
David, Kieren,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:16 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Nope. I had just sorted some of Kieren's wishes into categories that
> were reasonably easy to approach and ones that seemed harder, but I have
> not actually managed to start serious work (including thinking about
> suitabl
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> > So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
>> > answer about this specific case? I g
Janek Warchoł writes:
> Huh? I get $5000 (of which i'll spend quite a lot on Lily
> development, either directly or indirectly), and John Marchesi, GNU
> admin, gets $500 and gives it to whomever he decides - in our case
> most probably FSF.
Depends on whether he gets a different request on beh
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
>> Huh? I get $5000 (of which i'll spend quite a lot on Lily
>> development, either directly or indirectly), and John Marchesi, GNU
>> admin, gets $500 and gives it to whomever he decides - in our case
>> most probab
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 3:14 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> So don't think of spending the $5000 on LilyPond: spend your time.
>> That's what this is supposed to enable.
>
> Of course. They give me money to enable me spending time on LilyPond
> instead of doing some other
Reviewers: Graham Percival, Trevor Daniels,
Message:
Thanks Trevor, this one slipped past my radar.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5976056/diff/1/Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely
File Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5976056/diff/1/Documentation/no
Karol,
I hope someone can help you do what you wish. It's definitely beyond my
level of expertise. From my point of view on the bug squad, this doesn't
look like something that needs to be handled by us, so I'm going to suggest
that future correspondence on this issue not be sent to the bug squad.
On 28 April 2012 10:30, Graham Percival wrote:
> As long as I'm not personally playing nursemaid for people
> who don't run the basic tests
It seems that the whole talk about running tests is only because of me not
running them before uploading my first patches because I didn't know that I
shou
Could you please change the mails' subject? :) I've started a thread: Lilypond
patchy and other Lilypond problems for this discussion. Could you move
there?
Łukasz
On 27 April 2012 19:43, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "James"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: ; ; ; <
> lily
On 26 April 2012 20:41, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
>
> Mike, Graham and David wrote about more or less automatic running of tests
> and presenting only the results, possibly on an unused computer.
>
> I realised that I have a server on Dreamhost that probably could be such a
> computer - there is u
Hello,
On 28 April 2012 23:18, Łukasz Czerwiński wrote:
> On 28 April 2012 10:30, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> As long as I'm not personally playing nursemaid for people
>> who don't run the basic tests
>
>
> It seems that the whole talk about running tests is only because of me not
> running th
Hello,
> How much CPU time and memory would regtests consume?
Depends on how many CPUs you can allocate. You can run reg tests on 1
CPU or xCPUs. You explicitly state the number in your make command
'make -j7 CPU_COUNT=7' test will use 7 CPUs
'make test' just uses 1 CPU (even if you have more
Łukasz Czerwiński writes:
> On 28 April 2012 10:30, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>
> As long as I'm not personally playing nursemaid for people
> who don't run the basic tests
>
>
> It seems that the whole talk about running tests is only because of me
> not running them before uploading m
27 matches
Mail list logo
