Ian Hulin writes:
> I finally got my ssh access to savannah sorted yesterday, and I've got a
> small patch which has just gone in review and which James has marked as
> Patch-review. Now *assuming* the patch stands up to review, it would be
> ready to push in the next few days.
>
> I normally li
David,
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:58 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
...
>
> [Diversion: by the way, Phil and Graham? I have come to the conclusion
> that it is better if Patchy does not attempt any rebases or merges on
> its own. Can you change that accordingly? It should quite simplify
> Patchy
Peekay Ex writes:
> David,
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:58 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>
>> [Diversion: by the way, Phil and Graham? I have come to the conclusion
>> that it is better if Patchy does not attempt any rebases or merges on
>> its own. Can you change that accordingly? It
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 09:58:56AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> [Diversion: by the way, Phil and Graham? I have come to the conclusion
> that it is better if Patchy does not attempt any rebases or merges on
> its own. Can you change that accordingly? It should quite simplify
> Patchy and
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 09:58:56AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> [Diversion: by the way, Phil and Graham? I have come to the conclusion
>> that it is better if Patchy does not attempt any rebases or merges on
>> its own. Can you change that accordingly? It should
On 2011/10/18 17:46:23, Bertrand Bordage wrote:
LGTM. Two tiny changes and it'll be ready to push.
That was three weeks ago. Is this done? I still see the tracker open,
Janek owns that
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1873
but he is away so I am chasing the state of this.
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 01:25:24PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Sorry to be a pest. I am currently queuing up half a dozen of other
> issues/patches, and will likely need several releases to get the
> respective conversions done in reasonable proximity to their changes.
You're not a pest, and we
That is done, but before updating I wanted to resolve a few other
issues. However, I cannot figure out how to control the amount of
spacing between notes (I need the notes in a phrasing slur to be closer
together). Also, I can't get the beams to show properly.
http://codereview.appspot.com/495106
On Nov 8, 2011, at 10:16 PM, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/39005/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc
> File lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/39005/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc#newcode60
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 09:58:56AM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> [Diversion: by the way, Phil and Graham? I have come to the conclusion
>> that it is better if Patchy does not attempt any rebases or merges on
>> its own. Can you change that accordingly? It should
can somebody fix this? and depending on dak, either push directly
to master (which means he has to play yet more games with
dev/staging), or push to dev/staging and then wait for James to do
his stuff and then I'll try making 2.15.17 again then.
file from VC not distributed:
lilypond-2.15.17/Doc
passes make and reg test diffs are all here:
http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/Tracker-issue-2000-reg-test-diffs-9-Nov-2011-td4962666.html
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
h
Carl,
I reran the patch again on a new build but still only got that one reg
test show up.
So running lilypond directly on the reg tests I have attached them here
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=11#c31
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4941041/
__
Graham Percival writes:
> can somebody fix this? and depending on dak, either push directly
> to master (which means he has to play yet more games with
> dev/staging),
dev/staging is in a reasonably calm state right now and would be easy to
rebase. But what's the advantage?
> or push to dev/s
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:18:08PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > can somebody fix this? and depending on dak, either push directly
> > to master (which means he has to play yet more games with
> > dev/staging),
>
> dev/staging is in a reasonably calm state right no
Hey all,
iIm running regtests on a new version of a footnote patch and it's slowing down
like craaazzy. This has happened to me before, and the cause is always some
sorta memory leak, but i always stumble upon them haphazardly and by luck. Is
there a profiling tool i can use to show memory le
http://codereview.appspot.com/4877041/diff/25001/lily/grob.cc
File lily/grob.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4877041/diff/25001/lily/grob.cc#newcode639
lily/grob.cc:639: if (!vag)
How is vag supposed to have become false again after being true two
lines before?
http://codereview.appsp
http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/53017/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc
File lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/53017/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc#newcode72
lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc:72: //first, clump pure_releva
See
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1791#c10
Patch fails make check
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4877041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2011/08/30 16:28:28, mikesol_ufl.edu wrote:
On Aug 30, 2011, at 5:53 PM, mailto:joenee...@gmail.com wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is my understanding: wherever
there's
> a SpanBar, you're creating SpanBarStubs between every relevant pair
of
> staves. These don't actually ge
20 matches
Mail list logo
