I don't see this "proposal" (really more of "a set of musings")
going anywhere. There's been a bunch of ideas:
- tool X, tool Y
- make better use of our current tools
- do a survey of what other projects do
but nothing has made a significant amount of people go "yeah, that
the right directio
Passes make and reg tests look ok but I guess someone who really knows
should check
See:
http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/http-code-google-com-p-lilypond-issues-detail-id-1477-td4835846.html
This has a zipped dir of the make check results.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5037046/
___
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I don't see this "proposal" (really more of "a set of musings")
> going anywhere. There's been a bunch of ideas:
> - tool X, tool Y
> - make better use of our current tools
> - do a survey of what other projects do
> but nothing
On Sep 24, 2011, at 4:27 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:43:01PM -0400, Colin Campbell wrote:
>> Instead, we present a special, one time only, batch as
>> requested by Mike Solomon.
>
> Am I correct that these have not been checked by James? I don't
> think we should c
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:16:35AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>Then they should not be put on a countdown - I'm not sure which patches of
>mine will be review-ready by the time Colin sends out his weekly e-mail.
It's three times a week. There should be no rush to "get stuff
added
On Sep 24, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:16:35AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
>> Then they should not be put on a countdown - I'm not sure which patches of
>> mine will be review-ready by the time Colin sends out his weekly e-mail.
>
> It's thre
any chance of rebasing this patch?
http://codereview.appspot.com/224052/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:49:44AM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> What would be useful in git-cl is a way to signal to the
> PatchMeister the developer's perceived importance of a patch.
Current thinking is to automatically randomly pick 10 patch-review
for the countdown, with priority for
I've just discovered about 10 patches that had new versions, but
hadn't been updated with Patch-new, so James wasn't checking them,
so they weren't getting to Patch-review, so they were never
getting onto a countdown.
I got bored before I finished going throught the entire list, and
I didn't look
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
; ; ;
; ; ;
;
Cc: ;
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 9:00 PM
Subject: Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062)
make doc problem solved on my system. I can confirm that make and make
doc run successfully with this patch.
What did you do
On 2011/09/23 15:36:15, p-l-s wrote:
Hi Reinhold and Janek,
I hope I got it right this time. I didn't include the bit about
.
This will be part of a seperate patch.
BTW: I noticed that the midi-block is not always inserted in every .ly
file
(this is not related to my patch). I will do s
2011/9/23 Janek Warchoł
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> 2011/9/23 Bertrand Bordage :
> > * making a system that allows to specify where a word is breakable (like
> \-
> > in LaTeX);
>
> I vote for this because it seems most multi-language friendly. I.e.,
> implementing hyphenation rules for all major languag
Pushed as 688f5f1711d8ca07338385a2ae0191b1a8aae315.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4553056/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
2011/9/24 Bertrand Bordage :
> 2011/9/23 Janek Warchoł
>>
>> Hi Bertrand,
>>
>> 2011/9/23 Bertrand Bordage :
>> > * making a system that allows to specify where a word is breakable (like
>> > \-
>> > in LaTeX);
>>
>> I vote for this because it seems most multi-language friendly. I.e.,
>>
Peekay wrote Saturday, September 24, 2011 12:22 PM
2011/9/24 Bertrand Bordage :
I worked on this yesterday. I chose '--' instead of '\-'. The
result is
great (see attached).
Hmm... breaking a 4 letter word into two over two lines?
Splitting "père" is even worse - that's not even two syll
2011/9/24 Peekay Ex
>
> Hmm... breaking a 4 letter word into two over two lines?
> The typesetter in me cringes slightly.
>
Indeed, global rules would be great for absent-minded people like me...
@Trevor : Yes, this was only a manual demonstration.
Bertrand
_
This passes make and make doc on my computer, without a scratch.
This is a great work, but it doesn't fit correctly into LilyPond:
* This should be put inside the parmesan font, like every ancient font:
noteheads in parmesan-noteheads, accidentals in parmesan-accidentals,
clef in parmesan-clefs,
> What did you do to get make doc going?
I nuked my entire lilypond-git directory, reinstalled the source and
ran make and make doc.
Then, I ran the Kievan patch and recompiled.
A
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
> This is a great work, but it doesn't fit correctly into LilyPond:
OK, I will merge with Parmesan and work on the Scheme stuff.
> I also agree with Werner, there's also a lot of cleanup to do inside
> your MetaFont stuff.
I'm new to MetaFont, so right now I'm using it like a GUI-less
outline f
If all else fails maybe I can use the release candidate of lilypond for openSUSE 12.1 and update to 2.16.0 before release. If it supports
guile 2.0 then I'm wasting precious time on 2.14.2.
They wanted to drop lilypond as 2.12.3 has failed for 123 days in factory due to guile 2.0 and my absence fo
In program-option-scheme.cc we have
else if (var == ly_symbol2scm ("old-relative"))
{
lily_1_8_relative = to_boolean (val);
/* Needs to be reset for each file that uses this option. */
lily_1_8_compatibility_used = to_boolean (val);
val = scm_from_bool (to_boolean (v
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:53:56PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I understand it's been discussed before, but I am wondering whether
> it's worth thinking the unthinkable and considering moving away from
> make. I know it's been used in loads of projects and is much loved,
> but actually, from
On 09/24/2011 12:37 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
The problem with guile 2.0 is that it includes many major changes (compiled
code, new macro handling, new garbage collection, completely new
string/unicode handling, etc.), which also require major code changes and
restructuring. Lilypond, however
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: Big web page
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:03:21PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
You know, I'm wondering if this serves any purpose. It's a
humungous thing tha
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5050046/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make, get some reg tests show up but nothing of note.
See attached on
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1922#c1
http://codereview.appspot.com/5067041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.or
Passes make and reg tests show as before see:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1855#c9
James
http://codereview.appspot.com/4808082/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypo
Passes make, reg tests that get spewed out look identical, too many to
attach but they are zipped here
http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/http-code-google-com-p-lilypond-issues-detail-id-1846-td4837220.html
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917046/
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096050/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
This patch no longer applies to current tree (as of 24th Sept)
http://codereview.appspot.com/4974078/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5121042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make but there are a few reg tests that someone should look at
See
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1844#c5
http://codereview.appspot.com/4961041/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4950071/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4813048/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/4514042/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:53:56PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
> If all else fails maybe I can use the release candidate of lilypond
> for openSUSE 12.1 and update to 2.16.0 before release.
There is absolutely zero chance of lilypond 2.16 using guile 2.0.
There is maybe a 10% chance that any version
Reviewers: Trevor Daniels,
Message:
On 2011/08/10 22:32:13, Trevor Daniels wrote:
James
My suggestion was to remove the *material* in 5.1.7 and replace it
with material
from 5.4.3, removing 5.4.3 as a section. The reference at the end of
the
material from 5.4.3 will need to be removed. Als
James
Looks pretty good. I've made a couple of suggested additions. Could
you please make a new patch with these changes in, and then I'll give it
a more careful check over.
Trevor
http://codereview.appspot.com/4839061/diff/3001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
File Documentation
Pushed as 5aac8e8d8e2b1fc490354cba2cdecd204e9d5006
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Pushed as 049021415e2af3a48b1ec6d724df3d2f1d9f7dd3
http://codereview.appspot.com/5090045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: ,
Message:
This is a rather straightforward patch to take \relative out of the
grammar and let it be implemented as a music function.
I have copied some code from parser.yy straight to music-scheme.cc to
make ly:make-music-relative!. This code keeps the original indentation
so that g
Pushed as db3e78a1d3ac62dff61e80a3f0ccf60009f535ed to /dev/staging
http://codereview.appspot.com/5123043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 07:08:26PM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:53:56PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> > I understand it's been discussed before, but I am wondering whether
> > it's worth thinking the unthinkable and considering moving away from
> > ma
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>> > If I was writing a "make" system from scratch, I would describe
>> > dependencies in data structures that are viewable and editable, and
>> > have a separate program that uses those structures to determine which
>> > files need making.
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:41:05PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > This didn't happen for fun and giggles. Over the years, we've
> > built up hack upon hack, and ended up with this unholy mess.
>
> You sound spoiled.
Why, because I
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 03:12:14AM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:41:05PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > You sound spoiled.
On second thought, I really *am* spoiled: I don't want to even
notice the build system. I view it in the same way I view food:
a waste of tim
On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:31 PM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Passes make, reg tests that get spewed out look identical, too many to
> attach but they are zipped here
>
> http://lilypond-stuff.1065243.n5.nabble.com/http-code-google-com-p-lilypond-issues-detail-id-1846-td4837220.html
>
> http://coderev
On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:57 PM, pkx1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Passes make but there are a few reg tests that someone should look at
>
> See
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1844#c5
The only thing that I'm not sure about is beam-slope-stemlet.ly. What do
people think of this c
On 2011/09/19 18:48:17, mike_apollinemike.com wrote:
What I'd really like to know is why the spring ideal and minimum
distances are
different just by virtue of its belonging to the array, but I have a
feeling the
answer lies deep in the bowels of the horizontal spacing code and I
don't have
Graham Percival writes:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:41:05PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>> > This didn't happen for fun and giggles. Over the years, we've
>> > built up hack upon hack, and ended up with this unholy mess.
>>
>>
50 matches
Mail list logo
