Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 01:55:15 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> > yep, happens about 10% of the time for me. Running "make" again
>> > fixes it. (almost always -- the chance of two failing runs is
>> > about 1%. That's happened twice to me that I can recall)
>>
Pushed as 829f0ded77ee44ea6f0566fb5e5318802a8857ad.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5030053/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Graham Percival writes:
>> +1
>
> Automatic indentation *does* solve real problems.
My point exactly: use Emacs.
> Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen any more patches from that new
> contributor?
>
This looks like a contributor who needs some guidance. The first thing
I notice is
benko.pa
Graham Percival writes:
> Yep. I'd describe it as three websites
> It's a royal mess.
There is some value in having issues.google.com than only a bugs mailing
list, but there is indeed also a cost.
> Any ideas on how to deal with people who only want to deal with
> email?
We may want to have a
I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From:
To: "Phil Holmes" ; "Graham Percival"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:05 AM
Subject: RE: Problem with make
hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:13:00PM +010
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
David Kastrup writes:
"pkx1...@gmail.com" writes:
hello,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 05:13:00PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
On my fast build system, I can't cur
- Original Message -
From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
To:
Cc: "David Kastrup"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:07 AM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 01:55:15 schrieb David Kastrup:
> yep, happens about 10% of the time for me. Running "make" again
> fi
On Sep 22, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
>> Yep. I'd describe it as three websites
>> It's a royal mess.
>
> There is some value in having issues.google.com than only a bugs mailing
> list, but there is indeed also a cost.
>
>> Any ideas on how to deal
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Janek Warchoł"
Cc: "Phil Holmes" ; ;
"Aleksandr Andreev" ;
; ;
;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Glyphs for Kievan Notation (issue 4951062)
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:13AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
James, could you put this through the ringer? It's on patch countdown
and I don't really trust my regtesting abilities all too much.
Thanks.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.g
- Original Message -
From:
To: ; ;
Cc: ;
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: Fixes missing images in big website page (issue 4963046)
LGTM. A quick test showed no problems in make doc. I didn't get
pictures in make website, but then I tried make website witho
Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 09:58:05 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> > I only get such a problem if I call "make -j3" (or something other
> > >1). I have never experienced it with "make", so my guess would be
> > that the dependencies of our texinfo files are not compl
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
>
> To:
> Cc: "David Kastrup"
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:07 AM
> Subject: Re: Problem with make
>
>
>> Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 01:55:15 schrieb David Kastr
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes :
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:13AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>
>> Overnight i tried making doc on current master and it failed too.
>
> ef8dd3eaee73588faf1a6687407a6fda60cff591
> worked perfectly in ubuntu 10.04 (not quite lilydev) for me a few
> hours ago.
>
> 63cfd5
David,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:37 AM, wrote:
> James, could you put this through the ringer? It's on patch countdown
> and I don't really trust my regtesting abilities all too much.
>
> Thanks.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
No problem, I'll update the tracker to Patch-New (as t
Reviewers: Reinhold,
Description:
musicxml2ly: title and subtitle (issue 1913), miscellaneous
musicxml2ly: titles (fixes issue 1913), tagline, conversion-info,
, midi-cmd-line-option, center-column long instrument names
1) if XML: bli AND bla
--> LilyPond: title = bla subtitle = bli
2) the ta
Hello,
I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' this morning.
--snip--
/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/string-tunings-init.ly:128:0: error:
syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
\makeDefaultStringTunings #defaultStringTunings
]
[/home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/property-init.ly]
[/ho
Update done.
I think the C part is ok.
There's maybe a few things to change in the doc.
Shall I wait for a countdown or push directly?
Bertrand
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://list
On my new machine, I get:
phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
To ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git
! [rejected]master -> master (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to
'ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git'
To prevent you from
Janek
2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł :
>
> I know that Aleks uses Ubuntu Natty (not Lilydev).
> I use Lilydev - probably not the newest version, how can i check it?
System -> Administration -> System Monitor click on the first tab : )
That's the GUI way.
You can also do some other things to get bits
- Original Message -
From: "Peekay Ex"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:36 PM
Subject: Problem with make on a commit *after* Davids last '\pushAtTag'
commit- 264022bd6ebfed3220c0272d2c4a1c8ef9db4028
Hello,
I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' thi
On 22 September 2011 12:48, Phil Holmes wrote:
> We probably need to learn how to use git bisect...
It's David's most recent commit: 6c3445a0791831d450573cf583da36aecac5322c
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:44 PM
Subject: Problem with git push
On my new machine, I get:
phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
To ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git
! [rejected]master
Peekay Ex writes:
> Hello,
>
> I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' this morning.
>
> --snip--
>
> /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/string-tunings-init.ly:128:0: error:
> syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
Am bisecting right now, this is likely caused by a change of mine I
cons
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: "Devel"
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:44 PM
> Subject: Problem with git push
>
>
>> On my new machine, I get:
>>
>> phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
>> To ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/sr
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:44 PM
Subject: Problem with git
You can specify what you want to push:
git push --dry-run origin [hash]:[branch]
This will push every commit between [hash] and origin, assuming we stay in
[branch].
Bertrand
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/
David Kastrup writes:
> Peekay Ex writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' this morning.
>>
>> --snip--
>>
>> /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/string-tunings-init.ly:128:0: error:
>> syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
>
> Am bisecting right now, this is li
I'm just trying to push a single commit on master.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Bertrand Bordage
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org ; David Kastrup
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
You can specify what
The commit you want to push must follow origin/master.
If it does, just do:
git push --dry-run origin [hash_of_the_commit]:master
This will push this single commit.
If not, you have to rebase so that the commit follows origin/master:
git rebase -i origin
An editor opens, where you can change the
Hi Phil,
> Janek, Aleksandr - could you confirm what system you're getting make doc
> failing on?
Yes, I'm running Ubuntu Natty (not Lilydev).
More specifically, Linux sasha-desktop 2.6.38-11-generic #48-Ubuntu
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Aleks
___
lilypond-de
Some concerns and a handful of questions (as usual in my case).
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096050/diff/1/python/musicexp.py
File python/musicexp.py (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5096050/diff/1/python/musicexp.py#newcode63
python/musicexp.py:63: self.print_verbatim ('\\version "2.15
I've just used lily-git to do a hard reset of my git, reapplied the changes,
recommitted and redone the push --dry-run and am still getting the same error.
I'm not quite sure what it means for "commit you want to push must follow
origin/master" but it's definitely the sole commit which is on th
David Kastrup writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Peekay Ex writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm getting the following error when I tried to 'make' this morning.
>>>
>>> --snip--
>>>
>>> /home/jlowe/lilypond-git/ly/string-tunings-init.ly:128:0: error:
>>> syntax error, unexpected MUSIC_FUNCTION
>
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes :
> I've just used lily-git to do a hard reset of my git, reapplied the changes,
> recommitted and redone the push --dry-run and am still getting the same
> error. I'm not quite sure what it means for "commit you want to push must
> follow origin/master" but it's definitely t
Welcome to the wonderful world of LilyPond development!
Most changes look fine, but there are some things that can't be
submitted yet. See my comments.
Most important: Please edit the source file in scripts/musicxml2ly.py
and don't modify the installed musicxml2ly file and copy it over to the
sou
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Bertrand Bordage" ; "David Kastrup"
;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes :
I've just used lily-git to do a hard reset of my git, reapplied the
changes
Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 13:44:20 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> On my new machine, I get:
>
> phil@Ubuntu:~/lilypond-git$ git push --dry-run
> To ssh://philhol...@git.sv.gnu.org/srv/git/lilypond.git
> ! [rejected]master -> master (non-fast-forward)
> error: failed to push some refs to
Am Donnerstag, 22. September 2011, 15:30:14 schrieb Phil Holmes:
> That's what it appears to mean - but since I've done all the commands that
> should reset my git to be exactly the same as master, then done a 3 line
> change to lily/GNUmakefile, I can't see how there can actually be a
> conflict.
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing.
I've attached a crop of the difference between 2.15.12 and 2.15.10 - 2.15.12
is in red. You'll see that the 1 on the top of the note in bar 5 has gone
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first
> is shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes
> missing. I've attached a crop of the difference between 2.15.12 and
> 2.15.10 - 2.15.12 is in red. You'll see that the 1 on the top
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
"Phil Holmes" writes:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first
is shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indicatio
- Original Message -
From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
Simply fetch from the server:
git pull --rebase
Well, I was sure I must have done that at one point, but I've done it now
and success :-) Thanks Reinhold.
--
Phil Holmes
___
lilypond-d
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:01 PM
> Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>>
>>> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first
>>> is shown in the
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Bernardo Barros" ; "Devel"
; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: building faillure
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:08:26AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
$(outdir)/general-scheme.o: $(ou
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Graham Percival"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: "Bernardo Barros" ; "Devel"
> ; "lilypond-user"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:29 PM
> Subject: Re: building faillure
>
>
>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:08:26AM +0100, Phil Holmes w
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Reinhold Kainhofer" ;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
- Original Message -
From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
Simply fetch from the server:
git pull --rebase
Well, I was sure I must hav
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: building faillure
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Bernardo Barros" ; "Devel"
; "lilypond-user"
Sent: Tu
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes :
> - Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
> To: "Reinhold Kainhofer" ;
> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Problem with git push
>
>
>> - Original Message - From: "Reinhold Kainhofer"
>>
>>
>>> Simply fetch from the server:
>>> git
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object?
yes; I'd rather see an issue in the tracker instead.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>
> Exactly. Make copies the *.texi file from the source to the build dir, runs
> extract-texi-filenames.py and then removes it again...
Ouch. Is there any compelling reason to
1) not run extract-texi-filename.py on the origina
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:46:38PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12.
Could we get issues for these? I should probably cancel the
release countdown.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
li
Graham Percival writes:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:44:29AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>>
>> Exactly. Make copies the *.texi file from the source to the build dir, runs
>> extract-texi-filenames.py and then removes it again...
>
> Ouch. Is there any compelling reason to
> 1) not run ext
On 22 September 2011 17:38, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:46:38PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12.
>
> Could we get issues for these? I should probably cancel the
> release countdown.
I can't verify either problem here.
- Original Message -
From: "Janek Warchoł"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Reinhold Kainhofer" ;
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with git push
2011/9/22 Phil Holmes :
- Original Message - From: "Phil Holmes"
To: "Reinhold Kainhofer" ;
Sent: Thursda
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:46:38PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12.
Could
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: ; "Devel"
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with make
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object?
yes
On 9/21/11 10:29 PM, "Janek Warchoł" wrote:
> 2011/9/21 Carl Sorensen :
>>
>> Reviews in Google Code are done on branches, and each commit on the branch
>> is visible and reviewable.
>>
>
> Looks interesting, however i seem to be unable to add comments -
> probably because i'm not a project me
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>
> >On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >>I'd like to add a note to this effect in the CG - anyone object?
> >
> >yes; I'd rather see an issue in the trac
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5083045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Reviewers: J_lowe,
Message:
Well, I reworked this into a somewhat saner state. Took me hours, so
please don't be all too annoyed about the regtest you just completed. I
need another one.
Description:
parser.yy: allow composite_music to also consist of a MUSIC_IDENTIFIER.
Please review this at
Couldn't find a tracker issue for this, however it passes make and reg
tests.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5090045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Still passes make and reg tests
http://codereview.appspot.com/5090045/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Not sure what tracker (if any) issue this is but it now passes make and
reg tests.
http://codereview.appspot.com/5023044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>>
>> >On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> >>I'd like to add a note to this effect in
Hi all,
my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the music
notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
An idea should be to use different colors (for pdf), e.g. B=violet, A=brown, and
so on...
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
> music
> notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
> symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
>
> An idea should be to
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
> music
> notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
> symbols, so a G may be a B or viceversa.
>
> An idea should be to
Pushed as 83055a30e52c14b0fd49d6df3eb1c7af476ecb4b
http://codereview.appspot.com/5023044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Peekay Ex writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:55PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>>>
>>> >On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:17:50AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> >>I'd like
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:23:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Gee, I wonder why we haven't seen any more patches from that new
> > contributor?
> >
>
> This looks like a contributor who needs some guidance.
Yes.
> It should suffice to say: please fix
> inde
Since it has C changes as well, I'd prefer it to go through a countdown.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4917044/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:49:56AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Any ideas on how to deal with people who only want to deal with
> > email?
>
> We may want to have a look at the new http://bugs.gnu.org ,
> an implementation of debbugs.
Hmm, clunky user interface
2011/9/22 Graham Percival :
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:49:56AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Any ideas on how to deal with people who only want to deal with
>> > email?
>>
>> We may want to have a look at the new http://bugs.gnu.org ,
>> an implementation of d
2011/9/22 Peekay Ex :
> Janek
>
> 2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł :
>>
>> I use Lilydev - probably not the newest version, how can i check it?
>
> System -> Administration -> System Monitor click on the first tab : )
It says
janek-lilydev5 (that's my username and virtual machine name i guess),
Ubuntu rel
Am Thursday, 22. September 2011, 21:42:14 schrieb Peekay Ex:
> if it is of any use, the last 3 patches I have just tested for David,
> none gave me make failures at all. I even did two of them again twice,
> just to see if it was a fluke. So it seems to be the 'type' of files
> that get patched per
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:52:36PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> That's all just speculation, though, based on experience and gut feeling.
Based on my spectulation and gut feeling from seeing this off and
on for the past IIRC 1.5 years, it happens more often when you're
building from an exist
FWIW, I updated my kernel by installing the latest Ubuntu updates. I
also did a git rebase. I still get the same problem.
A
2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł :
> 2011/9/22 Peekay Ex :
>> Janek
>>
>> 2011/9/22 Janek Warchoł :
>>>
>>> I use Lilydev - probably not the newest version, how can i check it?
>>
>>
Hi Bertrand,
2011/9/23 Bertrand Bordage :
> Hi everyone,
> I started working on automatic hyphenation (see the attached PDF).
> I rewrote wordwrap-stencils into a wordwrap-markups and it works great, but
> I do have a question before continuing.
> Do you think I should start by:
> * implementing h
2011/9/22 Peekay Ex :
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Mauro wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> my daughter plays the harp (2nd year), but has some difficult to read the
>> music
>> notation: she is dyslexic. His difficulty consists in identify correctly the
>> symbols, so a G may be a B or vic
Get my github lilypond-extra repository:
https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-extra
then look at:
auto-compile/compile-lilypond-test.py
follow the instructions to set up your ramdisk (700 megs or 2048
megs, depending on whether you want to bother with the docs or
not), then run it:
python auto
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 00:52:24 schrieb Graham Percival:
> It automatically keeps track of the last "known good" compile, so
> if it ever fails, you know that somebody did something naughty
> since the last time you ran it. No guessing about "well, I think
> I compiled it last night at aro
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:03:08AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 00:52:24 schrieb Graham Percival:
> > It automatically keeps track of the last "known good" compile, so
> > if it ever fails, you know that somebody did something naughty
> > since the last time you
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 01:12:13 schrieben Sie:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:03:08AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm rebuilding binaries and docs from scratch every night on my
> > office machine to create the docs on http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond, so
> > we already have some
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 01:30:47AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 01:12:13 schrieben Sie:
> > - you're not building them from scratch
>
> I am. I nuke the build dir before each build.
oh, good! I didn't realize that. :)
> > - you don't keep a record of which
While we are at it: the docs compilation failed tonight...
Unfortunately, the output does not give any error message, so I have no idea
what is wrong.
Cheers,
Reinhold
-- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --
Betreff: GDP Docs compilation FAILED (2011.09.23-03:32)
Datum: Friday, 23. Sep
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:35:26AM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> While we are at it: the docs compilation failed tonight...
Thanks!
> Unfortunately, the output does not give any error message, so I have no idea
> what is wrong.
Well, the output contains this:
...
> fatal error: failed fil
Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
> > fatal error: failed files: "be/lily-48175def.ly"
>
> A decent build system would take that filename, grep it for
> "\sourcefilename", and tell us *that* information, instead of the
> current useless output. :)
A decent build system (or r
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
>> > fatal error: failed files: "be/lily-48175def.ly"
>>
>> A decent build system would take that filename, grep it for
>> "\sourcefilename", and tell us *that* information,
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>
> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
> shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing.
>
Confirming. The missing fingering indication is hidden under a note head
in the other voice. The change
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> I've not been able to check much more, because of subtle differences between
> the treble clef in 15.12 and 15.10, but that's a starter.
But the G clef changed between .8 and .9
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
l
Hello again..
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Peekay Ex wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer
> wrote:
>> Am Friday, 23. September 2011, 04:35:06 schrieben Sie:
>>> > fatal error: failed files: "be/lily-48175def.ly"
>>>
>>> A decent build system would take that
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
>>
>> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
>> shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing.
>>
> Confirming. The missing fingering indication is
On Sun 18 Sep 2011, 23:55 Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> i've noticed something strange in mensural-ligatures.ly: in the last
> system, a flat symbol collides with the notes (attached). Should it
> look like this?
> I tried to determine when it was introduced, but i cannot open eps
> files in L
mike apollinemike.com apollinemike.com> writes:
> On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
>
> > Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
> >>
> >> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
> >> shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes m
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:11:08 -0700, m...@apollinemike.com
wrote:
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
Phil Holmes philholmes.net> writes:
There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes miss
97 matches
Mail list logo
