"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> > To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:01 PM > Subject: Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems > > >> "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> writes: >> >>> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first >>> is shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes >>> missing. I've attached a crop of the difference between 2.15.12 and >>> 2.15.10 - 2.15.12 is in red. You'll see that the 1 on the top of the >>> note in bar 5 has gone. >>> >>> The second is performance. On longer scores, 2.15.12 is _much_ >>> slower. An example is the mozart horn regtest, which has gone from >>> about 14 seconds to 27 seconds on my system. >> >> Just to make sure it is not again me who is at fault: could you quickly >> check that the delay does not appear to happen already before the >> "Interpreting music" message? While it is quite unlikely that the >> parser will burn through significant time, it would be reassuring to >> have this doubt out of the way. > > Visually, it looks like it's the "Preprocessing graphical objects" > that's slower.
Sounds like Mike. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
