Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 03, 2010 3:31 AM
As you might recall, I gave a talk at RMLL 2010
about sustainable development in F/OSS.
Nice talk. It prompted me to think about my own involvement
with LilyPond. I volunteered for doc development due to
the guilt pressure at the start
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:10:25AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> 1) There is no architectural overview and no program logic manual to
> guide new developers through the early stages.
> This has the advantage that
No; there's no advantage to this. It's simply due to an imbalance
of high skill,
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, August 04, 2010 9:41 AM
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:10:25AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
1) There is no architectural overview and no program logic manual
to
guide new developers through the early stages.
This has the advantage that
No; there's no advant
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> 1) There is no architectural overview and no program logic manual to
> guide new developers through the early stages.
> This has the advantage that only experienced and expert
> coders able to deduce the design from the source code are
> able to contribute significantly
David Kastrup wrote Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:27 AM
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
1) There is no architectural overview and no program logic manual
to
guide new developers through the early stages.
This has the advantage that only experienced and expert
coders able to deduce the design from
Graham
While looking into the @help in download.itexi
(the font size used for smallexample) I
noticed that the css file currently being used to
build the web is css/lilypond-web.css. Is this
correct? The css title is "Patrick McCarty's design"
and there is a beautifully-laid out css file call
On 8/4/10 1:25 PM, "Trevor Daniels" wrote:
>
> David Kastrup wrote Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:27 AM
>
>
>> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>>
>>> 1) There is no architectural overview and no program logic manual
>>> to
>>> guide new developers through the early stages.
>>> This has the advantage
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:45:09PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> While looking into the @help in download.itexi (the font size used for
> smallexample)
Only if you're certain that it shouldn't be fixed in the texinfo,
btw. I mean, it might be better to rewrite something, or end the
itemized lis
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:33:30PM +0200, Mike Solomon wrote:
> I am a bit lost with respect to what has to be done and who's working on
> what, but I've been chipping away as best I can on issues that, to me, seem
> under-commented-upon.
In theory, the Status:Started, Owner:foo indicates that. I
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:45 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> While looking into the @help in download.itexi (the font size used for
> smallexample) I
> noticed that the css file currently being used to
> build the web is css/lilypond-web.css. Is this
> correct? The css title is "Patrick McCarty's d
LGTM, pushed to master.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1914043/show
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 2 August 2010 13:35, Mike Solomon wrote:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/1914043
Applied:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=commit;h=4ed35e481389eaddd6e07002f0b5ccad31994169
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
On 2010/08/03 09:57:27, MikeSol wrote:
I created a binding for chain_callback in grob-scheme.cc. Please see
http://codereview.appspot.com/1890044 . I'm fine using this and then
maybe
making a scheme version of set_axis (i.e.
side-position-interface::set-axis) in
the appropriate .scm file.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1890044/diff/1/2
File lily/grob-scheme.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1890044/diff/1/2#newcode407
lily/grob-scheme.cc:407: 3, 0, 0, (SCM grob, SCM proc, SCM sym),
0, (SCM grob
http://codereview.appspot.com/1890044/diff/1/2#newcode415
lily/grob-scheme.cc
Hello. I'd like to join the Frogs but my mailing list subscription hasn't gone
through. Is it just a matter of waiting for someone's manual input, or is
something wrong with the listserv?
- William Bajzek
williambaj...@gmail.com
___
lilypond-devel
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
http://codereview.appspot.com/1890044/diff/1/2
File lily/grob-scheme.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1890044/diff/1/2#newcode407
lily/grob-scheme.cc:407: 3, 0, 0, (SCM grob, SCM proc, SCM sym),
On 2010/08/04 18:50:59, Neil Puttock wrote:
0, (SCM grob
Done.
nevermind, it seems to be working now.
On Aug 4, 2010, at 12:54 PM, William Bajzek wrote:
> Hello. I'd like to join the Frogs but my mailing list subscription hasn't
> gone through. Is it just a matter of waiting for someone's manual input, or
> is something wrong with the listserv?
>
> - Wi
Reviewers: ,
Message:
Hi Mike,
Here are some general comments following testing:
-) showFirstLength still doesn't work
-) probably related to the above, but the combination of showFirstLength
and showLastLength doesn't work
-) if there's no time signature, showLastLength is ignored; this brea
http://codereview.appspot.com/1741060/diff/1/4
File scm/music-functions.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1741060/diff/1/4#newcode534
scm/music-functions.scm:534: (set! (ly:music-property m 'den) den)
These should come from the music (which means you'll be needing a fix
for issue #1198:
what's the plan for this patch/functionality ?
the code looks a bit out of style.
would it be possible to group all the internal-ledger code together?
Without wanting to trample on feet, this looks like a feature that could
easily bitrot due to lack of use, so it's good to make it easy to remove
Reviewers: hanwenn,
Message:
On 2010/08/04 21:44:58, hanwenn wrote:
what's the plan for this patch/functionality ?
the code looks a bit out of style.
It's an old patch which Kevin Dalley posted ages ago:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-03/msg00038.html
I've removed th
Hi Joe,
LGTM.
I'd be quite happy with this method, even though it loses a bit of
flexibility in comparison with your original patch.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1888042/diff/1/5
File lily/keep-alive-together-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1888042/diff/1/5#n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
On 01/08/10 22:37, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> On 1 August 2010 21:49, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>>> I think I found the problem.
>>>
>>> With Guile 1.9, `module-public-interface' doesn't r
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> On 01/08/10 22:37, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
>>> On 1 August 2010 21:49, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>>
I think I found the problem.
With Guile 1.9, `module-public-interface' doesn't
24 matches
Mail list logo
