On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 06:17:51PM +0200, Martin Tarenskeen wrote:
But thinking about this little project I was wondering: Would it be
possible to write a lilypond input file, using just pure Lilypond syntax
and some Scheme magick, that would produc
Hey all,
In compiling lilypond this morning, I saw this:
font-metric.cc:82: warning: unused parameter 'k'
Checking out the function in question, I saw this:
Box
Font_metric::get_indexed_char_dimensions (size_t k) const
{
return Box (Interval (0, 0), Interval (0, 0));
}
Not knowing what th
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
> Hey all,
> In compiling lilypond this morning, I saw this:
>
> font-metric.cc:82: warning: unused parameter 'k'
>
> Checking out the function in question, I saw this:
>
> Box
> Font_metric::get_indexed_char_dimensions (size_t k) const
> {
>
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:51 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> In compiling lilypond this morning, I saw this:
>>
>> font-metric.cc:82: warning: unused parameter 'k'
>>
>> Checking out the function in question, I saw this:
>>
>> B
On 2010/07/14 23:15:13, lemzwerg wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/4
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/4#newcode1059
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:1059:
Since the properties in this file are sorted alphabetically, this
Reviewers: lemzwerg, Neil Puttock,
Message:
On 2010/07/15 22:04:58, Neil Puttock wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/2
File lily/axis-group-interface.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/diff/1/2#newcode125
lily/axis-group-interface.cc:125: pure_height_cache =
sc
On 2010/07/21 20:16:56, joeneeman wrote:
I can change it to 100, but it's still a bit worrying that a few
measly hash
tables end up taking so much memory (there should only be one per
staff).
Ah, don't worry, I think I see what's going on. It's creating a new
hash table whenever the method'
On 2010/07/21 21:04:38, Neil Puttock wrote:
Ah, don't worry, I think I see what's going on. It's creating a new
hash table
whenever the method's called:
+ if (!to_boolean (scm_hash_table_p (pure_height_cache)))
This is always true.
I think it should be
if (scm_hash_table_p (pure_h
Hi everybody,
Please review this patch here: http://codereview.appspot.com/1665053/show
Thanks,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
