On 2010/07/21 20:16:56, joeneeman wrote:
I can change it to 100, but it's still a bit worrying that a few
measly hash
tables end up taking so much memory (there should only be one per
staff).
Ah, don't worry, I think I see what's going on. It's creating a new hash table whenever the method's called: + if (!to_boolean (scm_hash_table_p (pure_height_cache))) This is always true. I think it should be if (scm_hash_table_p (pure_height_cache) != SCM_BOOL_T) http://codereview.appspot.com/1817045/show _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
