2010/7/9 Carl Sorensen :
> I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me know
> what you think of them.
They look great. Just a nitpick: in the scanned sample, the right
edge of the symbol is aligned with the stem of the note.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet
On Thu 08 Jul 2010, 22:24 Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me know
> what you think of them.
Looks like "pull" (">" -- it's a "pull", right?) has unequal sides?
I haven't noticed this in the scanned image. Sorry if this is my eyes' problem
aga
Hello
On 09/07/2010 05:56, Peter Chubb wrote:
Given the variety of transposing instruments out there, I'd avoid any
of these details, and leave it that some instruments are
conventionally notated at a different pitch from their sounding pitch,
typically notated one tone higher (so-called B-flat
On 9 Jul 2010, at 06:24, Carl Sorensen wrote:
I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me
know
what you think of them.
There is a variation of symbols. Blatter suggests using arrows: <-
above a notehead for open, -> for close, and <-> with the arrowheads
above two
Carl Sorensen writes:
> I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me know
> what you think of them.
The positioning in the images is off: the symbols should slightly
precede the notes, in particular the pull symbol's vertical bar: if
there are one-columned fingerings or ac
Hans Aberg writes:
> On 9 Jul 2010, at 06:24, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
>> I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me
>> know
>> what you think of them.
>
> There is a variation of symbols. Blatter suggests using arrows: <-
> above a notehead for open, -> for close, and <->
On 7/9/10 4:26 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me know
>> what you think of them.
>
> The positioning in the images is off: the symbols should slightly
> precede the notes, in particular the pull symbol's
On 7/9/10 3:38 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk" wrote:
> On Thu 08 Jul 2010, 22:24 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me know
>> what you think of them.
> Looks like "pull" (">" -- it's a "pull", right?) has unequal sides?
Actually, I think it's a p
Carl Sorensen writes:
> I think that the engraver will need to move stuff around to align with
> the note column. It should be able to do that quite easily.
Sure, but the metrics should provide a natural starting position for
that, so that equivalent symbols created for a non-Feta font have a
c
On 7/9/10 5:40 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> I think that the engraver will need to move stuff around to align with
>> the note column. It should be able to do that quite easily.
>
> Sure, but the metrics should provide a natural starting position for
> that, so t
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 7/9/10 3:38 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk" wrote:
>
>> On Thu 08 Jul 2010, 22:24 Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>> I've got a draft of accordion push and pull symbols. Please let me know
>>> what you think of them.
>> Looks like "pull" (">" -- it's a "pull", right?) has unequal sides
On 7/9/10 5:43 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
> On 7/9/10 5:40 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>
>> I think that the "axis" of the pull symbol should be on the right edge
>> of its spine, of the push symbol on the optical right of the angle tip
>> (likely slightly left of the real angle tip), height
On 7/9/10 5:43 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
> On 7/9/10 5:40 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>
>> I think that the "axis" of the pull symbol should be on the right edge
>> of its spine, of the push symbol on the optical right of the angle tip
>> (likely slightly left of the real angle tip), height
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 7/9/10 5:43 AM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote:
>
>> On 7/9/10 5:40 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I think that the "axis" of the pull symbol should be on the right edge
>>> of its spine, of the push symbol on the optical right of the angle tip
>>> (likely slightly le
Carl Sorensen writes:
> On 7/9/10 8:07 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>
>>
>> Still, I think that the inner point of the angle (left by one slanted
>> line width compared with the pull symbol) of the push symbol is a
>> reasonably looking reference point for visual alignment with the left of
>> a g
On 7/9/10 8:36 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> Carl Sorensen writes:
>
>> On 7/9/10 8:07 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Still, I think that the inner point of the angle (left by one slanted
>>> line width compared with the pull symbol) of the push symbol is a
>>> reasonably looking re
Carl Sorensen writes:
> But here are the new names I'd propose:
>
> accDot --> dot
> accDiscant --> discant
> accFreebase --> freeBass
> accStdbase --> stdBass
> accBayanbase --> bayanBass
> accOldEE --> oldEE
>
> Do these make sense?
All of these (with the possible exception of oldEE which I ha
Carl Sorensen writes:
> But here are the new names I'd propose:
>
> accDot --> dot
> accDiscant --> discant
> accFreebase --> freeBass
> accStdbase --> stdBass
> accBayanbase --> bayanBass
> accOldEE --> oldEE
>
> Do these make sense?
All of these (with the possible exception of oldEE which I ha
Am Dienstag, 6. Juli 2010, 19:45:34 schrieb Helge Kruse:
> I need to write a piece with a tremolo like fast repetition. But since
> there are three notes in this repetition, the
>\repeat tremolo n { x y }
> doesn't work.
I have now created a patch that extends the current tremolo repeat
funct
Neil -- thanks ever so much for the detailed explanations.
> Take a look at lily/music.cc to see where the transposition takes place.
The transpose_mutable() function seems to be where it's at ... :-)
I note the following lines which are surely responsible for cleaning up
anything larger than a
Hi Reinhold,
This will be a great enhancement if you can sort out the forbidden
breaks between tremolos.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/1786041/diff/1/2
File input/regression/repeat-tremolo-three-notes.ly (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1786041/diff/1/2#newcode4
input/regre
On 9 July 2010 21:02, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
> Neil -- thanks ever so much for the detailed explanations.
You're welcome.
I hope what I've said is correct, since Carl's pinched my post and
added it to the Contributor's Guide. :)
> The transpose_mutable() function seems to be where it's at ... :
On 7/9/10 2:34 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> On 9 July 2010 21:02, Joseph Wakeling wrote:
>> Neil -- thanks ever so much for the detailed explanations.
>
> You're welcome.
>
> I hope what I've said is correct, since Carl's pinched my post and
> added it to the Contributor's Guide. :)
Yes, bu
On 09/07/10 05:56, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> "Paul" == Paul Scott writes:
>>
> Paul> On 07/07/2010 04:06 PM, Wols Lists wrote:
>
>>> On 07/07/10 19:06, Paul Scott wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
> Paul> The lowest
24 matches
Mail list logo
