Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 7/9/10 5:43 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > >> On 7/9/10 5:40 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> I think that the "axis" of the pull symbol should be on the right edge >>> of its spine, of the push symbol on the optical right of the angle tip >>> (likely slightly left of the real angle tip), height should be the same, >>> and reference point flush with the symbol bottom. >>> >>> Does that sound reasonable? >> >> Yes, it does. I currently have the reference point at the bottom, but at >> the left side of the glyph instead of the right side. I'll change that and >> reprint. > > Here's a revised version, that has the reference point at the bottom right > for both glyphs. If you'd like the push glyph shifted to the right (i.e. > the reference point shifted to the left), give me a suggestion for how much.
If you take a look at the following example, you'll see that my source does not exactly offer consistent spacing (obviously hand-engraved). Still, I think that the inner point of the angle (left by one slanted line width compared with the pull symbol) of the push symbol is a reasonably looking reference point for visual alignment with the left of a given notehead. Thanks! -- David Kastrup
pullpush.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
