Re: odd statement in NR

2010/5/19 Mark Polesky : > In NR 1.2.3 "Displaying rhythms -- Upbeats", the known > issues states: > >  The \partial command is intended to be used only at the >  beginning of a piece.  If you use it after the beginning, >  some odd warnings or effects may occur, in this case use >  \set Timing.mea

Re: Don't hardcode a limited set of markup signatures. (issue969046)

Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 4:22 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > > For one reason or another, whenever I review code from you it degrades > into a fight. I am not quite sure why this always happens. Because you don't bother taking the contributions of other peo

Re: odd statement in NR

Francisco Vila wrote: > No, \partial uses measurePosition internally. It is a beat > countdown for the current measure. Right, so if \partial generates odd warnings or effects, then measurePosition would too. Why would measurePosition behave any differently, as the text suggests? - Mark

Re: odd statement in NR

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: > Francisco Vila wrote: >> No, \partial uses measurePosition internally. It is a beat >> countdown for the current measure. > > Right, so if \partial generates odd warnings or effects, > then measurePosition would too.  Why would measurePositio

bounties

We have a bunch of items with "label:bounty". Many come from more than two years ago, so I'm not certain if bounty is still "open". But my initial guess is that the following ones are still valid: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=379 ugly slur with key signature and linebreak h

Re: bounties

Graham Percival writes: > We have a bunch of items with "label:bounty". Many come from more > than two years ago, so I'm not certain if bounty is still "open". Who gets the bounty? Developer or committer? Maybe I should start setting bounties for patches of my own in order to get them committ

Re: bounties

(sorry, hit "send" by accident) We have a bunch of items with "label:bounty". Many come from more than two years ago, so I'm not certain if bounty is still "open". But my initial guess is that the following ones are still valid: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=379 ugly slur

Re: bounties

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:51 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival writes: > >> We have a bunch of items with "label:bounty".  Many come from more >> than two years ago, so I'm not certain if bounty is still "open". > > Who gets the bounty?  Developer or committer? Whoever wrote the patch,

Re: bounties

Hi Graham, There are also other sponsorship offers (by me, which I can confirm are still "open") which don't seem to be in the Google code "bounty" pile:

Re: bounties

Hi David, > Who gets the bounty? Developer or committer? Developer. From the person who wants the fix. For example, I paid Han-Wen to program the lyricMelismaAlignment property. > Maybe I should start setting bounties for patches of my own > in order to get them committed. Sure: then you (the

markup signature generalization (was: bounties)

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi David, > >> Who gets the bounty? Developer or committer? > > Developer. From the person who wants the fix. > For example, I paid Han-Wen to program the lyricMelismaAlignment property. > >> Maybe I should start setting bounties for patches of my own >> in order to ge

[PATCH] fix remove_unneeded_anchor

Hello. This patch fixes remove_unneeded_anchor of lilypond-texi2html.init so that now - anchors that equal the filename are removed, respecting the .html part of the filename - anchors that differ from the filename are left untouched. The patch does not include a call to the function from the

Re: markup signature generalization

David Kastrup writes: > Kieren MacMillan writes: > >>> Who gets the bounty? Developer or committer? >> >> Developer. From the person who wants the fix. >> For example, I paid Han-Wen to program the lyricMelismaAlignment property. >> >>> Maybe I should start setting bounties for patches of my ow

Re: markup signature generalization (was: bounties)

Hi David, > I think that the $50 I'll pay myself when this gets through is well-invested. > Reducing line counts while extending functionality is a good deal. Agreed -- it sounds like a great patch! Looking forward to it being part of the base code. Thanks, Kieren. __

Re: bounties

On 2010-05-19 17:00, Kieren MacMillan wrote: Hi Graham, There are also other sponsorship offers (by me, which I can confirm are still "open") which don't seem to be in the Google code "bounty" pile: [...] Plus, I seem to

Re: bounties

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: > Oh, and of course I know that this amount "is extremely low given the > work involved", as Graham stated, but ... well - it's better than > nothing. Well, some people (not me) might not agree -- I mean, if something would take

Re: bounties

On 2010-05-19 19:08, Graham Percival wrote: I mean, if something would take you 20 hours, and somebody offers $10 and a piece of bubble gum, it's not very encouraging. If ten people offered the same thing, it would add up, of course. True. And that's how we all like to see it, right? Alas, t

Re: bounties

Graham Percival writes: > On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:55:19PM +0200, Alexander Kobel wrote: >> Oh, and of course I know that this amount "is extremely low given the >> work involved", as Graham stated, but ... well - it's better than >> nothing. > > Well, some people (not me) might not agree -

Re: bounties

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > There's a bunch of "ease-of-use" items that have a standard "50 euro > or double an existing bounty" from Valentin.  Since I'm pretty certain > he's in the worst financial situation of any lilypond developer, I > personally would take this

Re: odd statement in NR

Quoting Graham Percival : On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Mark Polesky wrote: Francisco Vila wrote: No, \partial uses measurePosition internally. It is a beat countdown for the current measure. Right, so if \partial generates odd warnings or effects, then measurePosition would too.  Why w

Re: odd statement in NR

On 19 May 2010 10:59, Mark Polesky wrote: > Right, so if \partial generates odd warnings or effects, > then measurePosition would too.  Why would measurePosition > behave any differently, as the text suggests? \partial sets measurePosition to a negative moment (which is noted in NR 1.2.3 above t

Re: odd statement in NR

On 5/19/10 3:41 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote: > On 19 May 2010 10:59, Mark Polesky wrote: > >> Right, so if \partial generates odd warnings or effects, >> then measurePosition would too.  Why would measurePosition >> behave any differently, as the text suggests? > > \partial sets measurePositio

Re: bounties

Hey bounty hunters, > We should certainly extend and emphasize the bounty system. Is there any resistance (philosophically) to using something like Kickstarter to get/track pledges? Just a thought... Kieren. ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-de

Re: bounties

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 06:08:06PM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hey bounty hunters, > > > We should certainly extend and emphasize the bounty system. > > Is there any resistance (philosophically) to using something like Kickstarter > to get/track pledges? I don't see the point of dragging i

Re: bounties

Hi Graham, > - we haven't seen much interest from developers in responding to > pledges. This might change. > - we haven't seen much interest from users in *making* pledges. > This might change, especially if we start advertising it, but > more especially if developers start chasing bounties.

Re: completion disturbed by other staff (issue 1082)

On 14 May 2010 06:26, Benkő Pál wrote: > updated the patch fixing the issue and attached > an example where the previous version failed. LGTM. A few minor nitpicks: + /* + note that note_dur may be strictly less than left_to_do_ + (say, if left_to_do_ == 5/8) + */ This c