On 14 May 2010 06:26, Benkő Pál <benko....@gmail.com> wrote: > updated the patch fixing the issue and attached > an example where the previous version failed.
LGTM. A few minor nitpicks: + /* + note that note_dur may be strictly less than left_to_do_ + (say, if left_to_do_ == 5/8) + */ This comment would be better placed first in this block. +++ b/input/regression/completion-heads-polyphony-complex.ly This test is very similar to the existing one, so it would be fine to call it completion-heads-polyphony-2.ly. +\version "2.12.0" "2.13.22" +Complex completion heads may be fooled by polyphony with a different rhythm. Please change this to something which explains that the polyphony in this test works properly. Thanks, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
