Marc Hohl schrieb:
Neil Puttock schrieb:
On 2 March 2010 11:25, Marc Hohl wrote:
Thanks. Can you please push it? I am not allowed to...
I'm happy to push, but there seems to be a problem: the default
repetition function is the tablature version; I think this is due to
the parser eval
Graham Percival schrieb:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 12:29:09PM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote:
Graham Percival schrieb:
In the feta font (I think that's included/font-table.ly), and in NR
1.2.5 rehearsal marks, in the example wi ththe other segno signs.
I didn't touch included/font-tabl
There's a FIXME in lily.scm:
(define (gui-no-files-handler)
(let* ((ly (string-append (ly:effective-prefix) "/ly/"))
;; FIXME: soft-code, localize
(welcome-ly (string-append ly "Welcome_to_LilyPond.ly"))
(cmd (get-editor-command welcome-ly 0 0 0)))
(ly:message (_ "Invoking `~a
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Hi all,
Greetings Ian,
such reports actually belong more to -devel than bug- (normal users
are not expected to daily build LilyPond ;-)
> I've just tried rebuilding from the latest git (using a totally new git
> repository)
> and
> $ sh autoge
On 3/14/10 5:59 AM, "Valentin Villenave" wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>
> Greetings Ian,
>
> such reports actually belong more to -devel than bug- (normal users
> are not expected to daily build LilyPond ;-)
>
>> I've just tried rebuilding from the lat
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=732
Reinhold proposed a patch for this problem in:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-11/msg00417.html
which was uploaded as
http://codereview.appspot.com/8687
Unfortunately, that website (not unreasonably) appears to d
Thanks for the report, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1036
Note that this is type-Build, priority-Postponed, so don't expect any
movement on the issue for at least 6 months.
Sorry,
- Graham
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Hello. This i
Am Sonntag, 14. März 2010 18:31:16 schrieben Sie:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=732
>
> Reinhold proposed a patch for this problem in:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-11/msg00417.html
> which was uploaded as
> http://codereview.appspot.com/868
Hello all,
it seems that explicit string information has to be used within chord
constructs
for *every* note, otherwise lilypond shows errors.
In the following example the second bar gives an error, because lilypond
uses the
"\2" for the first note within < ... >, this is the g which cannot b
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer
wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 14. März 2010 18:31:16 schrieben Sie:
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=732
>>
>> Unfortunately, that website (not unreasonably) appears to delete a
>> patch that's over a year old, so the patch is lost.
>
On 14 March 2010 15:38, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> I've been trying to build the docs with the attached patches for half
> a day without succeeding, so I figure it's time I call for help :(
>
> Can someone tell me what's wrong with these commits?
I've had a quick skim through both patches, and
On 14 March 2010 10:08, Marc Hohl wrote:
> Is there anything else I need to do, or is it ready to be pushed?
I've posted a few more comments on Rietveld; if you can sort these
out, I think it'll be ready to go.
Cheers,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailin
Hi Marc,
Here are a few more comments for you.
Cheers,
Neil
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1012/17
File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/224082/diff/1012/17#newcode256
Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:256: is provided.
On 14 March 2010 21:33, Neil Puttock wrote:
> I've had a quick skim through both patches, and can't see anything
> which is obviously broken. I'm doing a test build to see what's going
> on.
My docs build has just completed without a hitch, so there doesn't
appear to be anything wrong with your
On 14/03/10 13:25, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/14/10 5:59 AM, "Valentin Villenave" wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
Hi all,
Greetings Ian,
such reports actually belong more to -devel than bug- (normal users
are not expected to daily build LilyPond ;-)
I've just tri
On 3/14/10 12:14 PM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> it seems that explicit string information has to be used within chord
> constructs
> for *every* note, otherwise lilypond shows errors.
>
> In the following example the second bar gives an error, because lilypond
> uses the
> "\2" for the
Some doc images in "Extending" are not showing up in the
split-page version (though they appear in the big-page
version):
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond//Documentation/extending/simple-substitution-functions.html
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond//Documentation/extending-big-page.html#Simple-substitu
17 matches
Mail list logo
