Neil Puttock schrieb:
2010/1/8 Marc Hohl :
Yes, the picture in the tracker has one loop missing, but in
all other sources, the sign looked (mainly) as mine.
How do they deal with the segno at the end of a line though? The
tracker example is aligned as a normal barline (i.e., with the
Patrick Horgan wrote:
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Patrick (et al.),
for people who haven't used the LSR (lilypond snippet repository) before,
if you click on the pretty pictures of things you want to do,
they turn into lilypond code for you to learn from:) It's all automagic.
Your
(sorry, re-sending to list as well)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Hey everyone. Here's a first draft of my idea for the new
> CG chapter 2.
Don't use $ in front of examples. It makes it impossible to
cut&paste! This is an abomination that probably started in printed
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:41:21PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
> Hi, lilypond-2.12.3 is now available in openSUSE. It would be very much
> appreciated if someone could update the lilypond download page with this
> link :-
> http://software.opensuse.org/search?baseproject=openSUSE%3A11.2&p=1&q=lilypon
Graham Percival wrote Monday, January 11, 2010 11:30 AM
That said, a few more comments:
- if you're going to go to all this effort, please eliminate the
"git
on windows" section -- for each portion of the (unix-aimed) docs,
just
dump the relevant windows instructions on the bottom of the pag
Some of you might have bookmarked
out-www/offline-root/Documentation/index.html
as your local lilypond docs. This file no longer exists; please
do a git pull -r, (and then make doc), and then use
out-www/offline-root/index.html
I don't expect this to matter for the 2.14 website. Once 2.13.11
On 01/11/2010 01:38 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 04:41:21PM +0200, Dave Plater wrote:
>
>> Hi, lilypond-2.12.3 is now available in openSUSE. It would be very much
>> appreciated if someone could update the lilypond download page with this
>> link :-
>> http://software.ope
Hi Mark, Trevor, Graham,
On 11/01/10 12:29, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Monday, January 11, 2010 11:30 AM
That said, a few more comments:
- if you're going to go to all this effort, please eliminate the "git
on windows" section -- for each portion of the (unix-aimed) docs, jus
According to the guile developers, the latest ETA for guile V2.0 is
March 2010.
I've just seen on the guile developers list that they're busy
overhauling the debugger, just after Trevor and I have finished tarting
up guile debugger handling in lilypond.
Does anyone on this list know if there
Alexander Kobel wrote:
Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Hi,
this code:
\header {
poet = \markup \center-column {
\line { poet with Long Name }
\small (1800-1900)
}
composer = \markup \center-column {
\line { composer with Long Name }
\small (1800-1900)
}
}
{ c' }
results in f
I was active in GUILE development for some time, but I have given up
on it, mostly for lack of my time, but also because the GUILE team is
a champion in delaying releases. They always have had plans for
releases, but it appears that none of the developers have any sort of
hurry, and there is always
Alexander Kobel writes:
> Sorry in advance for non-proper indentation, a probably non-proper
> patch format, and not having in on Rietveld or something like this,
> but to be honest, I don't want to take the time to bother with git's
> functionality and a coding account setup right now.
Uh, but
Is automated-engraving.itexi being used anymore? Graham
removed these lines from essay.tely with commit 859f9f7 on
Dec 5 2009:
* automated-engraving:: Essay on Automated engraving.
@include automated-engraving.itexi
IIUC, it has been entirely replaced with similar material in
the Essay. If so,
>Original Message
>From: markpole...@yahoo.com
>Date: 11/01/2010 7:23
>To: "lilypond-devel"
>Subj: CG chapter 2, first draft
>
>Hey everyone. Here's a first draft of my idea for the new
>CG chapter 2. I left out some obvious things to save space.
>And of course there are unfinished spo
pound...@lineone.net wrote:
> I was just re-reading this section of the CG when this
> arrived. For me, the balance is just right.
>
> Particularly useful for me was:
>
> 1 - The extra explanation in "Organization of remote
> branches" is useful when the terminology is new
>
> 2 - The reassurance a
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:57:45AM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Is automated-engraving.itexi being used anymore? Graham
> removed these lines from essay.tely with commit 859f9f7 on
> Dec 5 2009:
>
> IIUC, it has been entirely replaced with similar material in
> the Essay. If so, should we get ri
>Original Message
>From: markpole...@yahoo.com
>Date: 11/01/2010 20:20
>To: "lilypond-devel", "pound...@lineone.net"
>Subj: Re: CG chapter 2, first draft
>
>pound...@lineone.net wrote:
>> I was just re-reading this section of the CG when this
>> arrived. For me, the balance is just righ
Hi all,
I am playing with the vertical spacing algorithms, and am very surprised by the
behavior of "page-height".
Let's say for example that I set my paper to A6. This, by ISO216, is 148mm
high.
Following the code in paper.scm, (I am using the most current git head), I can
see inernal-set-
b...@shingarov.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am playing with the vertical spacing algorithms, and am very
surprised by the behavior of "page-height".
Let's say for example that I set my paper to A6. This, by ISO216, is
148mm high.
when calc-printable-height applies (ly:output-def-lookup layout
'paper-h
Thanks Alexander,
This does indeed look suspiciously close to the truth.
But which part of the code might do this conversion? I looked at the
level of raw module-define! and ly_module_lookup(), I do not see how
these can contain any conversion code?
Quoting Alexander Kobel :
b...@shingaro
On 2010/01/11 01:05:07, Reinhold wrote:
AFAICS, Bar_line::compound_barline resets both "S." and ".S" to "S",
so this
should be fine. Or am I missing something?
If "S." or ".S" is (incorrectly) set in the middle of a line, the glyph
calculation won't be reset, resulting in a segno glyph paste
2010/1/11 :
> This does indeed look suspiciously close to the truth. But which part of the
> code might do this conversion? I looked at the level of raw module-define!
> and ly_module_lookup(), I do not see how these can contain any conversion
> code?
The conversion's done by scale-layout in pa
Le vendredi 08 janvier 2010 à 12:09 +, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Ok, let's get a few more opinions. Should we release a 2.12.4
> which is identical to 2.12.3 other than changing
> lilypond-texi2html.pl? If so, who is volunteering to do the work
> on lilypond-texi2html.pl ?
The problem isn'
Graham Percival wrote:
> Don't use $ in front of examples. It makes it impossible
> to cut&paste!
Well, not impossible. Besides, it's good to differentiate
the input from the output when quoting the output.
> Don't bother quoting the output.
Right.
> I think a fair chunk of it will be wasted
Graham Percival wrote:
> Don't use $ in front of examples. It makes it impossible
> to cut&paste!
Well, not impossible. Besides, it's good to differentiate
the input from the output when quoting the output.
> Don't bother quoting the output.
Right.
> I think a fair chunk of it will be wasted
25 matches
Mail list logo
