Alexander Kobel <n...@a-kobel.de> writes: > Sorry in advance for non-proper indentation, a probably non-proper > patch format, and not having in on Rietveld or something like this, > but to be honest, I don't want to take the time to bother with git's > functionality and a coding account setup right now.
Uh, but a reverse patch? It's not actually tragic since most patch commands I know will ask whether they should do it in reverse. I trust that someone with commit access (which does not include me) will pick this up and push. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
