On 6/18/09 10:17 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 08:55:08PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>>
>> Any reason why properties listed in define-grobs.scm
>> are not in alphabetical order? Sometimes I get a little
>> frustrated looking stuff up in IR 3.1.
>
> That file contains
> One curious thing I've noticed when looking over this
> is in the definition for Script:
>
> line 1477: ;; don't set direction here: it breaks staccato.
>
> ...then 9 lines later, direction is set...
>
> line 1486: (direction . ,ly:script-interface::calc-direction)
>
> I don't know if th
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> >> Any reason why properties listed in define-grobs.scm
> >> are not in alphabetical order? Sometimes I get a little
> >> frustrated looking stuff up in IR 3.1.
> >
> > That file contains:
> > ;;; todo:: reorder sensibly.
> >
> > and IMO alphabetical is a sensible orde
> > One curious thing I've noticed when looking over this
> > is in the definition for Script:
> >
> > line 1477: ;; don't set direction here: it breaks staccato.
> > ...then 9 lines later, direction is set...
> > line 1486: (direction . ,ly:script-interface::calc-direction)
> >
> > I don't
Mark,
This would be a good time for you to learn about testing.
See AU 1.2.5 for information about how to test and make sure your changes
haven't broken anything.
You should do this, and then you will know if you've broken anything.
Thanks,
Carl
On 6/19/09 2:17 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
On 6/19/09 2:17 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
> Actually it's 2 patches.
>
> Could someone test it out, make sure I didn't
> accidentally do something stupid? Should be okay,
> but it's such a big change... If it looks good,
> you know what to do!
>
Mark does not have the capability of compilin
Jay Anderson writes:
> See page 86 of the first file and page 44 of the second file at the
> Andante non tanto. The strings and the woodwinds are at the full f
> while the brass and percussion are only at :).
Reminds me of that rehearsal joke where the conductor stops the
orchestra, fro
On Sat, Jun 06, 2009 at 11:09:42PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> Have you tried \textLengthOn? See Notation Reference 1.8.1
Thanks. Although \textLengthOn at the beginning of the music solves the problem
of the jianpu, it also creates other problems (e.g. the word "cantabile" under
the first no
Windows users compiling according to LM 2.1.1 will never see the
console output. Is it possible to send the standard output also to
the .log file?
- Mark
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
I get this error message when compiling my lilypond source (by this
stage it's already produced the .ps file):
Converting to `./Exsultate-Andante.pdf'...
Invoking `gs -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=595.28
-dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=841.89 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH
-r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfw
This may be totally obvious to everyone here, but Windows users
can't just run guile without running LilyPond (I'm thinking for
users who are working on learning scheme). At least not to my
knowledge.
I've been using a very simple trick (don't expect to be impressed)
to work around this. In a mus
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:50 AM, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/19/09 2:17 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>> Actually it's 2 patches.
>>
>> Could someone test it out, make sure I didn't
>> accidentally do something stupid? Should be okay,
>> but it's such a big change... If it looks good,
>> yo
2009/6/19 Patrick McCarty :
> I ran the test suite with Mark's patches, and everything looks fine here.
I'd like to look at the patches, but they're obviously over the size
limit for attachments. :)
Can somebody post them on Rietveld so we can all have a look at them?
Regards,
Neil
__
2009/6/19 Mark Polesky :
>
> This may be totally obvious to everyone here, but Windows users
> can't just run guile without running LilyPond (I'm thinking for
> users who are working on learning scheme). At least not to my
> knowledge.
When I was using Windows exclusively, I used to open a command
Hi Francisco,
Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:17 +0200, Francisco Vila a écrit :
> Just curiosity, how do you make these commits after the merge, to
> appear in both branches?
I just push the same branch directly to both master and
lilypond/translation.
In the usual case, suppose I merged lilypond/tra
2009/6/19 Graham Percival :
> If you'd like to add f for consistency's sake, I'm happy to
> commit it -- but please also add a comment to dynamic-init that we
> really don't want more than 5 letters. :)
The curious thing about this is that there's already an entry for
f in absolute-volum
2009/6/18 Patrick McCarty :
> Okay, thanks for the guidance. Attached is a revised patch.
Cheers, it's applied.
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
2009/6/20 John Mandereau :
> Hi Francisco,
> Le jeudi 18 juin 2009 à 12:17 +0200, Francisco Vila a écrit :
>> Just curiosity, how do you make these commits after the merge, to
>> appear in both branches?
>
> I just push the same branch directly to both master and
> lilypond/translation.
This is gr
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/6/19 Patrick McCarty :
>
>> I ran the test suite with Mark's patches, and everything looks fine here.
>
> I'd like to look at the patches, but they're obviously over the size
> limit for attachments. :)
>
> Can somebody post them on Rietve
2009/6/19 Mark Polesky :
>
>> One curious thing I've noticed when looking over this
>> is in the definition for Script:
>>
>> line 1477: ;; don't set direction here: it breaks staccato.
>>
>> ...then 9 lines later, direction is set...
>>
>> line 1486: (direction . ,ly:script-interface::calc-dir
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> 2009/6/19 Patrick McCarty :
>>
>>> I ran the test suite with Mark's patches, and everything looks fine here.
>>
>> I'd like to look at the patches, but they're obviously over the size
>
2009/6/20 Patrick McCarty :
> The combined patches are here:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/83042/show
Thank you.
I can already sense Mark's next task: sorting the `interfaces' field. :)
Regards,
Neil
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-deve
22 matches
Mail list logo
