Tim, have you used VMware before? This should allow you to
compile LilyPond inside a virtual machine. I'm not certain what
the best way is to transfer the iso from Jonathan to you, though.
The goal of this iso to make it usable on a virtualization tool. The
open source Sun VirtualBox ca
In message <1244571546.25811.584.ca...@heerbeest>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
writes
I talked with Han-Wen about 2.10. The reason that we got up
to 2.10.*33*, is that with git, doing stable bugfix releases
is almost painless. Very little effort. We have small,
contained patches/commits, that can be ve
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Jonathan Kulp
> wrote:
> > On a fresh installation of Linux Mint (and previously of xubuntu, ubuntu,
> > crunchbang, and ubuntulite) I can't get the docs to build properly. It's
> > taking several "make doc"
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) <
lilypondt...@organum.hu> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>> Tim, have you used VMware before? This should allow you to
>>> compile LilyPond inside a virtual machine. I'm not certain what
>>> the best way is to transfer the iso from Jonathan to you,
There were some FIXME remarks about darwin-ppc's libgcc, but I
think I can ignore them. A few mingw strip commands had "command
barfed", such as libguile-srfi-srfi-60-v-2.l and
lilypond-windows.bat.in, but again I assume that I can ignore
those errors too.
This appears to be the thing that stops
Trivial patch to avoid so much clutter in the log files.
Cheers,
- Graham
>From dfcef16797c0b4afe109a34421a8bc6f2fb846c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lilypond Documentation Project
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:28:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unneeded warning message if uploads/signatures/ al
Le 10/06/2009 01:18, Graham Percival disait :
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:29:57PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
The two "corresponding files might be
input/regression/profile-property-access.ly
input/lsr/utf-8.ly
Those two files include non-Western fonts (such as Hebrew and
Japanese).
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:12:08PM +0200, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> GPL Ghostscript 8.63 (2008-08-01)
Hmm. I'm using ghostscript 8.62 and building correctly. GUB was
recently updated to use 8.65.
... actually, that's a thought. Can you compile these failing
files if you use the GUB bina
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
The goal of this iso to make it usable on a virtualization tool. The
open source Sun VirtualBox can for example mount this as the virtual
hard disk.
Once it's ready maybe I can create a torrent? I've never done that
before but it's probably the best way
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Success! Ok here's what I have:
>
> lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
cut the network transfer by more than half.
Cheers,
- Graham
__
Hi,
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> > Success! Ok here's what I have:
> >
> > lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
>
> And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
> cut the network transfer by more than half
Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:50:15PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Success! Ok here's what I have:
lilybuntu.iso (717 MB)
And what's that when you gzip or bzip2 it? This could potentially
cut the network transfer by more than half.
Cheers,
- Graham
I did bzip2 without
LGTM.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> Trivial patch to avoid so much clutter in the log files.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
>
> ___
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
13 matches
Mail list logo
