Op maandag 02-02-2009 om 02:21 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Johannes
Schindelin:
> > > Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
> > >
> > > My understanding is that
> > >
> > > a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
> > > infinite loop s
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>
> > I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is
> > it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
> - the LilyPond plugin for medi
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:32:11AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op maandag 02-02-2009 om 02:21 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Johannes
> Schindelin:
>
> > > Assign two Frogs to the task:
> > > - one person ensures that lilypond input without **any** scheme
> > > will always end in a reasonab
Op dinsdag 21-04-2009 om 21:38 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
McCarty:
Hi Patrick,
> I ran the command that is failing through strace, and the output is
> attached.
>
> Line 65 looks like the place tar open()s the CWD. My system tar (GNU
> tar 1.22) also opens the CWD at this point, runn
Op woensdag 22-04-2009 om 14:48 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Jan
Nieuwenhuizen:
Hi Patrick,
> fails. I'm attaching a patch that you can try as workaround. Now it
> puzzles me why tar does *not* fail in GUB for me. It should. Hmm.
Interesting, if I use the command below to print the current
2009/4/21 Francisco Vila :
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
>> How is it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
> - the LilyPond plugin for mediawiki
I'm
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:22:54PM -0300, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Graham Percival :
> > As I always say, lilypond can do it if there's enough interest.
> > If there's real, honest, interest in lilypond-in-a-wiki, then
> > somebody will step forwards to work on the issues.
>
Graham (et al.),
Programmers are made, not born.
True.
We're not genetically superior to non-programmers.
Speak for yourself! ;-)
When you stop learning, you're dead.
More to the point: when you're dead, you stop learning.
Just my (muck-raking) 2¢.
Kieren.
__
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:52:59 am Graham Percival wrote:
> You're alive, so you can learn. When you
> stop learning, you're dead.
Paul Erdös said of mathematicians that if they had died,
they had left. If they were not doing mathematics anymore,
they were dead.
Ian
--
___
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > I think their concern that Scheme is needed to do anything useful is
> > unfounded, and that Scheme just should be disabled for the purpose of
> > the MediaWiki extension.
>
> I thing this was n
Neil Puttock gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please review this patch here:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/8874/show
Looks good!
Carl
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-deve
Hi Jan,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 02:48:38PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op dinsdag 21-04-2009 om 21:38 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Patrick
> McCarty:
>
> > I ran the command that is failing through strace, and the output is
> > attached.
> >
> > Line 65 looks like the place tar open()s th
>> Please review this patch here:
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/8874/show
>
> Looks good!
I'm not a good lisp programmer, but isn't the standard method for
searching like that to not use a loop but recursive calls? It doesn't
really matter, but Han-Wen likes to use recursive calls a lot
13 matches
Mail list logo
