Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:47 PM
> I think it is even ok to insert them everywhere -- we have also
> @ignore and @end ignore.
I'm not opposed to this in principle, but you'll have to find
someone else to go through all the .itely files and insert them. I
don't even
> > I think it is even ok to insert them everywhere -- we have also
> > @ignore and @end ignore.
>
> I'm not opposed to this in principle, but you'll have to find
> someone else to go through all the .itely files and insert them. I
> don't even have enough time at the moment to complete the real
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
I think it is even ok to insert them everywhere -- we have also
@ignore and @end ignore.
I'm not opposed to this in principle, but you'll have
to find someone else to go through all the .itely files
and insert them. I don't even have enough time at the
moment to comple
Trevor Daniels wrote:
I'm not opposed to this in principle, but you'll have
to find someone else to go through all the .itely files
and insert them. I don't even have enough time at the
moment to complete the really important stuff, like
getting the text correct, and everyone else who was
work
Till Rettig wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: ugly @predefined sections in PDF
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:48 PM
There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly
bad. Could we instead change just
Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:48 PM
There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly
bad. Could we instead change just those instances so each of
predefined commands is on a separate line? Is this possible? It
would certainly
Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:48 PM
There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly
bad. Could we instead change just those instances so each of
predefined commands is on a separate line? Is this possible? It
would certainly be easier!
It's not cle
> There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly
> bad. Could we instead change just those instances so each of
> predefined commands is on a separate line? Is this possible? It
> would certainly be easier!
It's not clear to me why this would be `easier'. Assume that later
MBERG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:51 AM
Subject: ugly @predefined sections in PDF
Folks,
the @predefined sections show names of commands which are typeset with
a fixed-width font, and which are usually quite long. In the PDF
version of the manual, t
Folks,
the @predefined sections show names of commands which are typeset with
a fixed-width font, and which are usually quite long. In the PDF
version of the manual, this often causes ugly horizontal spacing.
I suggest to use a @flushleft environment to improve that. However,
this implies tha
10 matches
Mail list logo
