Werner LEMBERG wrote Wednesday, November 19, 2008 2:48 PM
There are only a couple of instances where this looks particularly
bad. Could we instead change just those instances so each of
predefined commands is on a separate line? Is this possible? It
would certainly be easier!
It's not clear to me why this would be `easier'. Assume that later on
a new command is inserted or removed. The editor would have to check
the PDF output whether the result is fine. In case I use @predefined
... @endpredefined, the result is *always* fine.
In general, I prefer a generic solution to a specific one, given that
in this particular case it's really easy to do -- inserting a couple
of @endpredefined doesn't hurt IMHO,
Ah, maybe I misunderstood. I'd assumed the @endpredefined would
have to be inserted after every list of predefined commands. If
it is required only after the problematic ones then I agree with
you.
Werner
Trevor
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
