On Tue 05 Jul 2011, 23:22 David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi, Colin --
>
> On 7/5/11, Colin Campbell wrote:
> >
> > This will probably require an issue, David, but could you send the code
> > you used to produce the 2.12.3 version, please? I can't reproduce the
> > previous stable example, in order to c
Hi, again --
>
> I've also attached a pared-down version of the file which should work
> in either release, as is. It distills the problem a little more -- at
> the expense of centering the number directly on the beam . . .
>
My last email included an image produced with 2.12.3. Attached is the
Hi, Colin --
On 7/5/11, Colin Campbell wrote:
>
> This will probably require an issue, David, but could you send the code
> you used to produce the 2.12.3 version, please? I can't reproduce the
> previous stable example, in order to confirm the regression, because
> your Scheme-ing gives an erro
On 11-07-05 01:44 AM, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:10 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
Hello, all --
Greetings,
First of all, I hope that I'm asking this question on the appropriate list!
Since you're demonstrating a regression, I'm forwarding your message
to our bug- list.
- Original Message -
From: "David Nalesnik"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 10:10 PM
Subject: tuplet number on cross-staff kneed-beam
Hello, all --
First of all, I hope that I'm asking this question on the appropriate
list!
I'm trying to simplify the wo
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 11:10 PM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hello, all --
Greetings,
> First of all, I hope that I'm asking this question on the appropriate list!
Since you're demonstrating a regression, I'm forwarding your message
to our bug- list.
> I'm trying to simplify the workaround relatin
Hello, all --
First of all, I hope that I'm asking this question on the appropriate list!
I'm trying to simplify the workaround relating to tuplet-number
position on kneed beams
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=646
and I'm running into an unexpected problem.
My reasoning is that, since the
