On Tue 05 Jul 2011, 23:22 David Nalesnik wrote:
> Hi, Colin --
>
> On 7/5/11, Colin Campbell <c...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> >
> > This will probably require an issue, David, but could you send the code
> > you used to produce the 2.12.3 version, please? I can't reproduce the
> > previous stable example, in order to confirm the regression, because
> > your Scheme-ing gives an error:
> > LilyPond 2.12.3 [music.ly] starting (preview mode)...
> > Processing `music.ly'
> > Parsing...
> > Interpreting music...
> > Preprocessing graphical objects...
> > Finding the ideal number of pages...
> > Fitting music on 1 page...
> > Drawing systems...music.ly:19:12: In procedure + in expression (+
> > (ly:grob-property beam #) (/ # 2)):
> > music.ly:19:12: Wrong type argument in position 1: ()
> > LilyPond [music.ly] exited with return code 1.
> >
> Oops -- yes, the error happened because 'thickness is now
> 'beam-thickness. I've attached the file I used for the 2.12.3 image.
>
> I've also attached a pared-down version of the file which should work
> in either release, as is. It distills the problem a little more -- at
> the expense of centering the number directly on the beam . . .
>
> I hope that in some way this is useful :)
I've added this as 1745:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1745
Thank you!
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
Bug Squad
"Easy to use" is easy to say.
--Jeff Garbers
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
