Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:54:30PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Le 13/06/2009 20:14, Graham Percival a écrit : > > To counter-act the "texi2html looks boring" idea, here's a new > > version: > > http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html > > You made the proof of concept of

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:00:21PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Graham > Percival wrote: > > To counter-act the "texi2html looks boring" idea, here's a new > > version: > > http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html > > Cool! I think this i

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 03:59:59PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Graham > Percival wrote: > > That was actually the default for the init file -- it took me > > about an hour to figure out how to hack-comment-out lines so it > > wouldn't do this!  :) > > I started

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 6/20/09 2:21 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 09:57:20AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:54:30PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >>> Le 13/06/2009 20:14, Graham Percival a écrit : >>> - also, if we end up going this route, somebody (I'm w

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 09:57:20AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:54:30PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: >> > Le 13/06/2009 20:14, Graham Percival a écrit : >> > >> > > - also, if we end up going this route, somebo

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 09:57:20AM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote: > On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:54:30PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > > Le 13/06/2009 20:14, Graham Percival a écrit : > > > > > - also, if we end up going this route, somebody (I'm willing to do > > > it, although I wouldn't mind d

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:54:30PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote: > Le 13/06/2009 20:14, Graham Percival a écrit : > > > - also, if we end up going this route, somebody (I'm willing to do > > it, although I wouldn't mind delegating this :) needs to make > > the nagivation menu show the current

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-20 Thread John Mandereau
Le 13/06/2009 20:14, Graham Percival a écrit : > To counter-act the "texi2html looks boring" idea, here's a new > version: > http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html You made the proof of concept of using texi2html to write a website in Texinfo; this is nice and promising, I

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-15 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <4a33fbd3.2040...@gmail.com>, Jonathan Kulp writes Graham Percival wrote: 3) Ok, so why do I want to use texinfo so much? - makes pdfs+info. I personally *never* use those formats, but I know that some people still use them. IMO, if we're going to support those formats for th

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-14 Thread Cameron Horsburgh
And for completeness, I'm the guy who uses info! -- Cameron Horsburgh Blog: http://spiritcry.wordpress.com/ ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-14 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi all, 3) Ok, so why do I want to use texinfo so much? - makes pdfs+info. I personally *never* use those formats, but I know that some people still use them. IMO, if we're going to support those formats for the manuals, we should support them for the information that's on the website.

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-14 Thread Paul Scott
Jonathan Kulp wrote: Graham Percival wrote: 3) Ok, so why do I want to use texinfo so much? - makes pdfs+info. I personally *never* use those formats, but I know that some people still use them. IMO, if we're going to support those formats for the manuals, we should support them for th

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-13 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Graham Percival wrote: 3) Ok, so why do I want to use texinfo so much? - makes pdfs+info. I personally *never* use those formats, but I know that some people still use them. IMO, if we're going to support those formats for the manuals, we should support them for the information that's o

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-13 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Graham Percival wrote: > To counter-act the "texi2html looks boring" idea, here's a new > version: > http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html Cool! I think this is a definite improvement to the website's organization. I really wish we could

Re: texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-13 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/13 Graham Percival : > To counter-act the "texi2html looks boring" idea, here's a new > version: > http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html You haven't asked for comments but here they are anyway: -- The garish colours and backgrounds look bad. -- Red-text-on-black-im

texi2html web page, second attempt

2009-06-13 Thread Graham Percival
To counter-act the "texi2html looks boring" idea, here's a new version: http://percival-music.ca/blogfiles/out/lilypond-general_1.html 1) *NO*, I don't think the garish colours and backgrounds look good. I'm showing that we can do whatever we want, not proposing that red-text-on-black-image is ea