pull again.
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Kulp"
To: "Trevor Daniels"
Cc: "Kieren MacMillan" ;
"lilypond-devel List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use
Ugh. I have
John Mandereau wrote:
Jonathan Kulp a écrit :
The conflicting files are exactly the ones I modified to create the
patch. True, the CG guide has a section on conflict resolution but
it's not finished yet.
This is true the CG is not finished, but I don't see the need to add
anything to this sec
Jonathan Kulp a écrit :
The conflicting files are exactly the ones I modified to create the
patch. True, the CG guide has a section on conflict resolution but
it's not finished yet.
This is true the CG is not finished, but I don't see the need to add
anything to this section, as the referenced
John Mandereau wrote:
Jonathan Kulp a écrit :
Ugh. I have a merge conflict upon pulling. Did I mess up the patch?
What are the conflicting files? Your patch is the last commit on master,
so if Trevor applied it without amending it, the conflict is likely
related to changes other than this p
Jonathan Kulp a écrit :
Ugh. I have a merge conflict upon pulling. Did I mess up the patch?
What are the conflicting files? Your patch is the last commit on master,
so if Trevor applied it without amending it, the conflict is likely
related to changes other than this patch you made locally.
, May 13, 2009 2:32 AM
Subject: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use
Patch attached. It has patches for three different files so I just
named it
after the one with the most changes, working.itely. Hope there's no
confusion...
Jon
--
Jonath
Thanks Jon - pushed to origin/master
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Kulp"
To: "Kieren MacMillan"
Cc: "lilypond-devel List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 2:32 AM
Subject: [PATCH]Re: tempoMark - documentation and use
Patch attached. It h
Patch attached. It has patches for three different files so I just named it
after the one with the most changes, working.itely. Hope there's no
confusion...
Jon
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> IMO, we [in the docs] should *not* be encouraging t
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
IMO, we [in the docs] should *not* be encouraging the use of
RehearsalMarks for tempo indications -- this is exactly why the \tempo
command was rewritten [can't remember by whom at the moment, but "thanks!"].
In other words, this example should *also* be changed... mayb
Jon,
Yes! I'll change this one accordingly.
Thanks,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Jon (et al),
Now there's also a "tempoMark" function defined in NR 6.1.2,
Interfaces for programmers. My instinct is to leave this one
alone--it is not obsolete, since the predefined \tempo command does
not take a $padding argument like this bit of scheme does, rig
Mats,
I tried incorporating your suggestions with mixed success. The
following definition works:
mpdolce = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:hspace 0 #:translate '(5 . 0)
#:line(#:dynamic "mp" #:text #:italic "dolce" )))
I changed the (cons 5 0) as you suggested, and changed hspace value to
Graham Percival wrote:
So should we remove (conseverywhere? That'd be easy enough to
grep for.
No, not in situations where you want to evaluate the values before you
form the pair, like the following example from programming-interface.itely:
manualBeam =
#(define-music-function (par
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 06:24:31PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>>
>> mpdolce = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:hspace 1 #:translate (cons 5 0)
>> #:line(#:dynamic "mp" #:text #:italic "dolce" )))
> It seems that the above line is copied from the current documentation
>
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Before I make a bunch of replacements and a patch, can anyone see a
potential problem with changing the example in LM 5.1.5 to use these
functions instead:
%%
mpdolce = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:hspace 1 #:translate (cons 5 0)
#:line(#:dynamic "mp" #:text
Hi Jon (et al),
Now there's also a "tempoMark" function defined in NR 6.1.2,
Interfaces for programmers. My instinct is to leave this one
alone--it is not obsolete, since the predefined \tempo command does
not take a $padding argument like this bit of scheme does, right?
IMO, we [in the
Jonathan Kulp wrote Tuesday, May 12, 2009 6:22 AM
Graham Percival wrote:
> Yes, come up with another score marking. Granted, it might get
[snip]
I agree, that's best for the moment.
Before I make a bunch of replacements and a patch, can anyone see
a potential problem with changing the e
In message <4a0907a4.2080...@gmail.com>, Jonathan Kulp
writes
Graham Percival wrote:
Yes, come up with another score marking. Granted, it might get
[snip]
Before I make a bunch of replacements and a patch, can anyone see a
potential problem with changing the example in LM 5.1.5 to use these
Graham Percival wrote:
> Yes, come up with another score marking. Granted, it might get
[snip]
Before I make a bunch of replacements and a patch, can anyone see a
potential problem with changing the example in LM 5.1.5 to use these
functions instead:
%%
mpdolce = #(make-dynamic-script (
On 5/10/09 4:43 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
wrote:
> In message , Carl D. Sorensen
> writes
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/9/09 4:21 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
>> wrote:
>>> So - is there a function that combines stencils? Or where can I find the
>>> code for \default (I did look ...) so I can try and wri
Yes, come up with another score marking. Granted, it might get
obsoleted... hopefully the \mpdolce example will be obsoleted in
the next few months. So perhaps this subsection should be
rewritten to show how we would go about adding a new command,
taking an existing one as an example.
But this l
Hey guys,
I'm looking at this example now and am not sure what to do with it. While
it's true that the tempoMark scheme function itself is not necessary now
that \tempo does the same thing, it's also true that the point of this
passage in the LM 5.1.5 is to show how use definitions and to place t
In message , Carl D. Sorensen
writes
>
>
>
>On 5/9/09 4:21 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
>wrote:
>> So - is there a function that combines stencils? Or where can I find the
>> code for \default (I did look ...) so I can try and write a defaultPlus
>> function that takes a string argument ... I found
In message , Carl D. Sorensen
writes
On 5/9/09 4:21 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
wrote:
So - is there a function that combines stencils? Or where can I find the
code for \default (I did look ...) so I can try and write a defaultPlus
function that takes a string argument ... I found the LSR exa
On 5/9/09 4:21 PM, "Anthony W. Youngman"
wrote:
> So - is there a function that combines stencils? Or where can I find the
> code for \default (I did look ...) so I can try and write a defaultPlus
> function that takes a string argument ... I found the LSR example that
> combines the rehearsal
Graham Percival wrote:
Where in the world is Carmen Sandi... oops, wrong example.
If "the \tempoMark" exaple is in the NR, then Jonathan should
figure out what you're talking about and prepare the patch.
If "the \tempoMark" example is in the LM... then hey, this is
simple enough, Jonathan shoul
Where in the world is Carmen Sandi... oops, wrong example.
If "the \tempoMark" exaple is in the NR, then Jonathan should
figure out what you're talking about and prepare the patch.
If "the \tempoMark" example is in the LM... then hey, this is
simple enough, Jonathan should still prepare a patch.
Hi,
The \tempoMark example should be completely rewritten to use \tempo
(i.e., MetronomeMark) instead of overriding RehearsalMark -- e.g.,
the first entry should read
mpdolce = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:hspace 1 #:translate (cons
5 0)
#:line(#:dynamic "mp" #:text #:italic "dolce"
I've got a problem with this ...
I don't know if it's been dealt with in the documentation but in the
2.12.2 manual section 4.3 (and 12.1.2), this function still uses
no-spacing-rods, which 2.12 doesn't support. I was advised to use
extra-spacing-width so I'm not affected, but anyone who copie
29 matches
Mail list logo
