On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 11:13:52PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/7/29 Graham Percival :
>
> > 6) If we want to use this, the patch needs to be examined
> > carefully. There aren't many problems, but we definitely
> > shouldn't apply it blindly. (we'd have lost that good comment
> > otherwis
2009/7/29 Graham Percival :
> Let's tackle the cc files first. I tried running it on everything
> lily/*.cc, and ended up with a 126K diff.
>
> 1) many changes were simply moving */ to the left by 1 char.
> That's fine.
I've amended these myself a few times, but it's just occurred to me
the ex
2009/7/29 Graham Percival :
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> $ emacs -batch vertically-spaced-context-engraver.cc --eval
>> '(indent-region (point-min) (point-max) nil)' -f save-buffer
>>
>> (tested on cc files, seems to leave them as they currently are)
> Is th
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> Those two copyPasteable lines do work.
Thanks, added to the CG.
> $ emacs -batch vertically-spaced-context-engraver.cc --eval
> '(indent-region (point-min) (point-max) nil)' -f save-buffer
>
> (tested on cc files, seems to leave t
Those two copyPasteable lines do work.
2009/7/29 Francisco Vila :
>> If somebody could post command-line copy&paste for:
>> 1) apply texinfo-all-menus-update to a file
$ emacs -batch my-texinfo-file.tely -f texinfo-all-menus-update -f save-buffer
(tested)
or possibly
$ emacs -batch my-texinfo
2009/7/29 Graham Percival :
> As an aside, could somebody (Francisco?) post a copy&pasteable
> line to use emacs for the source code formatting? Yes, I could
> read the emacs man page and try to figure out how to use the emacs
> -batch command myself, but there's other things that are more
> impor
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 09:19:43PM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Graham
> Percival wrote:
> > Seriously? I'm *amazed* at all the work that Mark has been doing.
> > Despite the handicap of using windows (can't compile lilypond,
> > doesn't have the handy developm
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:56:53PM +, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>> On a larger scale, I am somewhat disappointed that a lot of the latest
>> lilypond efforts seem to be centered around janitorial work. While
>> janitorial work is often u
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:56:53PM +, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On a larger scale, I am somewhat disappointed that a lot of the latest
> lilypond efforts seem to be centered around janitorial work. While
> janitorial work is often useful and a good way to introduce yourself
> to a code base,
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Jan
Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Same for our Class_naming_scheme. Now every project with classes has
> their own naming scheme; while we were one of the first in GNU. We
> could(should) have made a point of standardizing that (or at least
> pressing for a standard) fo
On ma, 2009-07-27 at 18:50 -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jan
> Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> > Maybe we can start a repository at savannah that collects snippets
> > like this for all types of editor and all projects that decide to
> > add a little enhancement over t
> "Carl" == Carl Sorensen writes:
Carl> On 7/25/09 10:58 AM, "Mark Polesky"
Carl> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ...tabs in the source code...
>>
>> Werner Lemberg wrote:
>>> I dislike them, too, but there are many editors which handle them
>>> just fine. I don't see a problem here.
>> But would you b
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jan
Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Maybe we can start a repository at savannah that collects snippets
> like this for all types of editor and all projects that decide to
> add a little enhancement over the standard coding settings? What
> do you think? That would make it
On ma, 2009-07-27 at 19:13 +0200, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
> Le 27 juil. 09 à 17:16, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
>
> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Graham
> > Percival wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > Sure - just include a .emacs snippet in the appropr
Le 27 juil. 09 à 17:16, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Graham
Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
I hate them. Who would object if I just started running
tabs->space
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Graham
Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>> Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
>> I hate them. Who would object if I just started running
>> tabs->spaces on the source docs? I think we should have
>
Le samedi 25 juillet 2009 à 09:58 -0700, Mark Polesky a écrit :
> But even in such cases, as long as my tab-width matches the
> tab-widths in the source, tabs2spaces should be fine. Is it
> correct to say that git (or savannah) translates all tabs to 8
> spaces without exception?
Git doesn't trans
On 7/25/09 11:47 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> No, Jan was not in favor of it unless it became a standard for
>> GNU coding. Hence the comment on "first making it a standard"
>> (i.e., a GNU standard) and "sending a patch to emacs-devel".
>>
>> The current standard
On 25 Jul 2009, at 19:39, Patrick McCarty wrote:
One thing you could do right now, without awaiting approval, is to
check for lines that have tabs *after* spaces at the beginning. These
should be converted to tabs *followed* by spaces.
This is not correct, as if tabs are set to 8 spaces, 2 sp
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> No, Jan was not in favor of it unless it became a standard for
> GNU coding. Hence the comment on "first making it a standard"
> (i.e., a GNU standard) and "sending a patch to emacs-devel".
>
> The current standard is to let tabs and spaces be handled as
> emacs handles them
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 09:58:26AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Also, can we list all of the possible situations where we need to
> retain tabs? Ian mentioned .make files; the last time this came up
> Patrick McCarty mentioned something about demarcating syllables in
> lyrics, which I don't thin
On 7/25/09 10:58 AM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> ...tabs in the source code...
>
> Werner Lemberg wrote:
>> I dislike them, too, but there are many editors which handle
>> them just fine. I don't see a problem here.
>
> But would you be *opposed* to a strict no-tab rule?
>
> Carl Sorense
Joe Neeman wrote:
> I like spaces just fine, but I'd prefer it if you could hold off
> on this for a little while. I have a big patch that I'd like to
> merge and I'm not so keen on resolving a bunch of whitespace
> conflicts...
Okay, I'll make a note: I'll wait for Han-Wen, Jan, and Joe.
Thanks
On Sat, 2009-07-25 at 09:58 -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> ...tabs in the source code...
>
> Werner Lemberg wrote:
> > I dislike them, too, but there are many editors which handle
> > them just fine. I don't see a problem here.
>
> But would you be *opposed* to a strict no-tab rule?
I like spaces
...tabs in the source code...
Werner Lemberg wrote:
> I dislike them, too, but there are many editors which handle
> them just fine. I don't see a problem here.
But would you be *opposed* to a strict no-tab rule?
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> The last communication we had about it, Han-Wen was
> cond
On 7/24/09 11:32 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote:
>
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
>>> Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
>>> I hate them. Who would object if I just started running
>>> tabs->spaces on the source
>> Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
Then use a different editor.
>> I hate them.
I dislike them, too, but there are many editors which handle them just
fine. I don't see a problem here.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing
Hi Graham,
Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
I hate them. Who would object if I just started running
tabs->spaces on the source docs? I think we should have
a strict no-tabs rule. And I'm
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:30:30PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
> > I hate them. Who would object if I just started running
> > tabs->spaces on the source docs? I think we s
Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> > Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
> > I hate them. Who would object if I just started running
> > tabs->spaces on the source docs? I think we should have
> > a strict no-tabs rule. An
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 06:15:31PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Thanks, Neil. My editor does confusing things with tabs.
> I hate them. Who would object if I just started running
> tabs->spaces on the source docs? I think we should have
> a strict no-tabs rule. And I'm in good company:
> http://lis
31 matches
Mail list logo
