On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Graham Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:56:53PM +0000, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> On a larger scale, I am somewhat disappointed that a lot of the latest >> lilypond efforts seem to be centered around janitorial work. While >> janitorial work is often useful and a good way to introduce yourself >> to a code base, it should not become the focus of either development >> or discussion about development. > > Seriously? I'm *amazed* at all the work that Mark has been doing. > Despite the handicap of using windows (can't compile lilypond, > doesn't have the handy development environment+tools we take for > granted on windows), he's doing a _fantastic_ job! I know that I > always used to say "oh, you don't need to compile the C++ to do > lots of work on lilypond programming", but I never actually knew > what I was talking about. :)
Right - that is why in general I don't want to oppose people who take initiatives (like banning tabs), but in this particular case, I am not sure if the heat is worth the light. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
