Am Montag, 5. September 2011, 23:05:12 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
> 2011/8/30 Graham Percival :
> > Guys,
> > --
> > *** STOP PUSHING BROKEN STUFF TO MASTER. ***
> > --
> >
> > At least until we've had two mor
2011/8/30 Graham Percival :
> Guys,
> --
> *** STOP PUSHING BROKEN STUFF TO MASTER. ***
> --
>
> At least until we've had two more unstable releases (.9 and .10)
> If you haven't tested your patch from a CO
Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:17 PM
How about we make a "staging" branch in git, then encourage people
to push to "staging" instead of master? We will then have
somebody (probably James) merge from staging to master, after
checking that it builds completely.
Sounds like a
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 02:11:31PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > At least until we've had two more unstable releases (.9 and .10)
> > If you haven't tested your patch from a COMPLETELY EMPTY build
> > directory, done make and make docs FROM SCRATCH, then don't push
>
Graham Percival writes:
> Guys,
> --
> *** STOP PUSHING BROKEN STUFF TO MASTER. ***
> --
>
> At least until we've had two more unstable releases (.9 and .10)
> If you haven't tested your patch from a C
Guys,
--
*** STOP PUSHING BROKEN STUFF TO MASTER. ***
--
At least until we've had two more unstable releases (.9 and .10)
If you haven't tested your patch from a COMPLETELY EMPTY build
directory, done m
