Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:17 PM
How about we make a "staging" branch in git, then encourage people to push to "staging" instead of master? We will then have somebody (probably James) merge from staging to master, after checking that it builds completely.
Sounds like a good idea, if James or someone else is willing to take this on. But encouraging contributors to properly test their patches before pushing might be a better way to go. That way they would find any residual bugs and fix them right away, without having to go through a staging loop. Also, if contributors thought James was going to do the testing for them they might just get lazy ;) Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
