Le 26/11/2022 à 16:16, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
OK, but where exactly is this documented? Is this missing, or am I
blind?
I think it's not written anywhere.
If it is missing, could a Scheme expert please write some
lines that I could incorporate into an MR?
Nothing complicated: If a num
>>> Are there still cases where `#` is mandatory for numbers?
>>> Otherwise the documentation could be updated to remove all `#`.
>>
>> Yes, there are: In markup, for example.
>>
>> \markup \fontsize 3 Hi
>>
>> is still illegal.
OK, but where exactly is this documented? Is this missing, or am I
>> Why not. If you want to be even more precise on what you want to
>> match:
>>
>> -\d+|((\d+|\\breve|\\longa)\.*)
>
> if someone really wants to touch that, please note that \maxima too
> is a duration.
Indeed, this is missing. I will add this to my work that will
eventually result in a PR f
Jean Abou Samra ezt írta (időpont: 2022. nov.
25., P, 18:05):
> > Le 25 nov. 2022 à 17:54, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
> > OK, but shouldn't this be rather
> > (-?\d+|\\longa|\\breve)\.*
> > then?
>
> Why not. If you want to be even more precise on what you want to match:
>
> -\d+|((\d+|\\breve|\\lo
> Le 25 nov. 2022 à 17:54, Werner LEMBERG a écrit :
>
>
>>
>>> Note that at the time this regex is active, numbers are taken care
>>> of.
>>
>> Floats are, integers not.
>
> OK, but shouldn't this be rather
>
> ```
> (-?\d+|\\longa|\\breve)\.*
> ```
>
> then?
Why not. If you want to
I agree this would be a better regex, yes.
(You still have that double re: thing in the subject going on, Werner)
L
On Fri, 25 Nov 2022, 17:55 Werner LEMBERG, wrote:
> >> Note that at the time this regex is active, numbers are taken care
> >> of.
> >
> > Floats are, integers not.
>
> OK, but sh
>> Note that at the time this regex is active, numbers are taken care
>> of.
>
> Floats are, integers not.
OK, but shouldn't this be rather
```
(-?\d+|\\longa|\\breve)\.*
```
then?
Werner
