I agree this would be a better regex, yes. (You still have that double re: thing in the subject going on, Werner)
L On Fri, 25 Nov 2022, 17:55 Werner LEMBERG, <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Note that at the time this regex is active, numbers are taken care > >> of. > > > > Floats are, integers not. > > OK, but shouldn't this be rather > > ``` > (-?\d+|\\longa|\\breve)\.* > ``` > > then? > > > Werner > >
