2010/10/28 Valentin Villenave
>
> I think Graham already made my point. With Sibelius, I used to spend
> roughly an hour per *system*, tweaking everything, pushing
> accidentals, solving collisions, manually removing tuplet numbers,
> faking stuff using invisible voices that, in turn, caused new
>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> Actually Pd has an ever-growing set of GUI
> objects-- you can see some of them being shown
> off in the image on Pd's Wikipedia page.
Well, that was kinda my point :-D
Nah, just kidding. Pure Data looks simply gorgeous.
For a Plan-9 ap
--- On Thu, 10/28/10, Graham Percival wrote:
> From: Graham Percival
> Subject: Re: problematic commit
> To: "Valentin Villenave"
> Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes" , lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thursday, October 28, 2010, 12:11 AM
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at
2010/10/28 Jonathan Wilkes :
> Well, no, I'm referring to Lilypond here.
> What I mean is that
> a) "\tempo 4=72" looks easy, but if someone
> asks how to get that tempo but have it
> display as quarter note = "ca. 72", as far as I
> know one has to have two two \tempo commands,
> one as above, an
--- On Wed, 10/27/10, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> From: Valentin Villenave
> Subject: Re: problematic commit
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 9:02 PM
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM,
> Jonathan Wilkes
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:13:14PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> > Zing! That was a cheap shot.
>
> What can I say? You taught me well, Master :-)
Yeah, but I keep it classy, Valentine! I mean, making fun of
somebody's girly nam
Am Mittwoch, 27. Oktober 2010, um 23:13:14 schrieb Valentin Villenave:
> Putting "ca." in front of a metronome marking is something I've never
> done (Jon, I assume you mean "ca." as an abbreviation for "circa"? If
> you meant "ca." as in a French word, then proper spelling is "ça" :-).
Ah, do I l
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Zing! That was a cheap shot.
What can I say? You taught me well, Master :-)
> He means "if your audience is so text-hostile that they can't
> understand \include, then there's no bloody way that they can
> write scheme code and override
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:02:48PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > I'm interested to know how successful your sales pitch has been. I did a
> > free software talk a few weeks ago but talked mostly about Pure Data and
> > Ardour, plu
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> I'm interested to know how successful your sales pitch has been. I did a
> free software talk a few weeks ago but talked mostly about Pure Data and
> Ardour, plus music-oriented distros of GNU/Linux.
I suspect that it may be (ever so sl
On 10/24/10 6:17 AM, "Valentin Villenave" wrote:
>
> Better luck next time (if there is a next time, which I doubt)...
Don't give up now!
The documentation stuff can be worked out -- if you had posted it on
Rietveld, Graham would have given you feedback.
And now you've got the right way to
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> Well, to be fair, it's not the music function that's the problem;
> rather, you've neglected to make `make-void-music' a thunk, which
> means it's evaluated immediately music-functions.scm is loaded.
I had initially defined it using parenthes
On 24 October 2010 13:17, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> On 24 October 2010 12:32, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>>> Feel free to revert it.
>>
>> TBH, I'm sorely tempted to myself.
>
> Then please do.
>
>> There's a memory leak from `make-void-mu
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 24 October 2010 12:32, Valentin Villenave wrote:
>> Feel free to revert it.
>
> TBH, I'm sorely tempted to myself.
Then please do.
> There's a memory leak from `make-void-music', which suggests you
> haven't done a regression test check
On 24 October 2010 12:32, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Graham Percival
> Feel free to revert it.
TBH, I'm sorely tempted to myself.
There's a memory leak from `make-void-music', which suggests you
haven't done a regression test check or run make doc.
I don't thi
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> I would have liked to see this in codereview before it showed up in git
> master.
Feel free to revert it.
> changes.tely:
> - why is \include "still recommended"?
Because \include works with "arabic.ly".
> pitches.itely:
> - if \inclu
On 10/23/10 7:43 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> - perhaps we should not consider arabic.ly as a "language", but rather
> as an "instrument (or music) style", like bagpipes.ly or gregorian.ly.
I think that is correct.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-devel
I would have liked to see this in codereview before it showed up in git master.
changes.tely:
- why is \include "still recommended"?
pitches.itely:
- if \include is still recommended, then why is \language discussed first?
- I see a @noindent, which is heavily discouraged by the doc policy.
- I
18 matches
Mail list logo
