more on octavation lines.

2004-01-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Han-Wen, I suggest the following minor modification. Instead of O 8ba _ _| it is sufficient to have O 8ba_| Having `_|' is fully sufficient to indicate a proper octavation spanner; it reduces the left offset of `8ba' significantly. Werner

Re: more on octavation lines

2004-01-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > . The final `delimiter' (the small vertical bar) must have a > > greater horizontal offset. I suggest to move it one notehead > > width to the right. > > I added > > (shorten-pair . (0.0 . -0.6)) > > for the ottave Hmm, probably not the right solution. Now the ottava lines broken a

Re: more on octavation lines

2004-01-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > . The final `delimiter' (the small vertical bar) must have a > > greater horizontal offset. I suggest to move it one notehead > > width to the right. > > Hmm, maybe a half notehead width is better... And the `8va' string should be slight offset to the left also. Attached are images and

more on octavation lines

2004-01-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > . Octavation lines must have a minimum distance from the staff lines; > I suggest to use 1.2 times the distance between two lines in a > staff. Fixed. > . Another problem is that currently we get the following for > octavation lines broken across systems: > >

Re: more on octavation lines

2004-01-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> . The final `delimiter' (the small vertical bar) must have a greater > horizontal offset. I suggest to move it one notehead width to the > right. Hmm, maybe a half notehead width is better... Werner ___ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL

more on octavation lines

2004-01-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
. Octavation lines must have a minimum distance from the staff lines; I suggest to use 1.2 times the distance between two lines in a staff. . Another problem is that currently we get the following for octavation lines broken across systems: 8 ---