more on octavation lines.

2004-01-26 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Han-Wen, I suggest the following minor modification. Instead of O 8ba _ _| it is sufficient to have O 8ba_| Having `_|' is fully sufficient to indicate a proper octavation spanner; it reduces the left offset of `8ba' significantly. Werner

Re: more on octavation

2004-01-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > % . A default horizontal offset to the right of the `8' should be > > % dependent on the length of the created octavation spanner. > > % With other words, even if the octavation covers only a single > > % note, we have to see a bit of the horizontal octavation line > > % and the closing

Re: more on octavation

2004-01-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> ok, so > > > > not this: > > > >8-- > > | > > o > > | > > > > <-> > > should be bigger than the ledger, no? Just a small amount, yes. In tight situations, it is even possible to center the `8' directly below the note, dropping the ottava line complete

Re: more on octavation

2004-01-19 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > % . The padding between the notes/staves and the ottava line must > > > % not take into account the final vertical dashed line. > > > > > > > huh? You want the vertical line to bump into the ledgers (3rd line) ? > > Perhaps a misunderstanding. I want this: >

Re: more on octavation

2004-01-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > % . The padding between the notes/staves and the ottava line must > > % not take into account the final vertical dashed line. > > > > huh? You want the vertical line to bump into the ledgers (3rd line) ? Perhaps a misunderstanding. I want this: 8-- o | | not this:

more on octavation

2004-01-19 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > % > % . The octavation in the fourth line misses vertical padding to the note > % head. > % > % . A default horizontal offset to the right of the `8' should be > % dependent on the length of the created octavation spanner. With other > % words, even if the octavat

more on octavation

2004-01-19 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > % > % . The octavation in the fourth line misses vertical padding to the note > % head. this is a silly bug. > % . A default horizontal offset to the right of the `8' should be > % dependent on the length of the created octavation spanner. With other > % words,

more on octavation

2004-01-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Han-Wen, we are getting nearer. Again, thanks for your work on this. Werner == % % This file shows problems with octavation in lilypond % CVS 2004-01-18 23:13 MET. % % . The octavation in the fourth line misses vertic

Re: more on octavation lines

2004-01-14 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > . The final `delimiter' (the small vertical bar) must have a > > greater horizontal offset. I suggest to move it one notehead > > width to the right. > > I added > > (shorten-pair . (0.0 . -0.6)) > > for the ottave Hmm, probably not the right solution. Now the ottava lines broken a

Re: more on octavation lines

2004-01-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > . The final `delimiter' (the small vertical bar) must have a > > greater horizontal offset. I suggest to move it one notehead > > width to the right. > > Hmm, maybe a half notehead width is better... And the `8va' string should be slight offset to the left also. Attached are images and

more on octavation lines

2004-01-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > . Octavation lines must have a minimum distance from the staff lines; > I suggest to use 1.2 times the distance between two lines in a > staff. Fixed. > . Another problem is that currently we get the following for > octavation lines broken across systems: > >

Re: more on octavation lines

2004-01-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> . The final `delimiter' (the small vertical bar) must have a greater > horizontal offset. I suggest to move it one notehead width to the > right. Hmm, maybe a half notehead width is better... Werner ___ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL

more on octavation lines

2004-01-12 Thread Werner LEMBERG
. Octavation lines must have a minimum distance from the staff lines; I suggest to use 1.2 times the distance between two lines in a staff. . Another problem is that currently we get the following for octavation lines broken across systems: 8 ---