Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-30 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/6/29 Graham Percival : > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: >> Can you make me a project member on the bug tracker?  It will save >> time and hassle if I can do the tagging myself once I've ported each >> bugfix. > > Certainly!  That should been done ages ago. Thank

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:28:44PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote: > > - enhancement: something which requires new code. > > this is informative! Might as well cc this to CG 6.2 with a > heading like "TODO: clean this up." Well, there's a few other tags, and it needs to be

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Graham Percival wrote: > - enhancement: something which requires new code. > > - accepted: default status once added (by a member) > - fixed: programmer thinks it's resolved > - verified: Bug Meister checks the results in an official binary > and agrees it's resolved > > - priority-high: lilyp

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:11:09PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote: > > Are the exact criteria for labeling posted somewhere? CG 6.2 Issue classification. ... ok, it's a blank section right now, but the location of the *eventual* posting is obvious. :) (once you accept that the CG is your Lord and Ma

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Mark Polesky
Patrick McCarty wrote: > > IMO, everybody who's semi-seriously (or more) involved in lilypond > > development should be registered there; it would be annoying if > > you fixed some bug, but couldn't register the fix. > > I agree. Are the exact criteria for labeling posted somewhere? I seem to r

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:31:26PM -0700, Graham Percival wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > > Can you make me a project member on the bug tracker? It will save > > time and hassle if I can do the tagging myself once I've ported each > > bugfix. > > Certainly

Re: membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/29 Graham Percival : > Does anybody else want to be a member for our google issue > tracker?  This lets you add labels (such as "fixed_2_12_x") and > stuff.  You need a google account to do this. For me is enough to be able to make comments (what I currently am). Translation does not benefi

membership for the issue tracker

2009-06-29 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 04:41:22PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote: > Can you make me a project member on the bug tracker? It will save > time and hassle if I can do the tagging myself once I've ported each > bugfix. Certainly! That should been done ages ago. Does anybody else want to be a member for