Mats, you wrote, Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:26 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
So, for the example in question, the NR should certainly state
categorically what the voice names are in the various constructs, and
examples showing the differences would be fine. But I don't think
there is any need
TECTED]>;
Cc: "Paul Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LilyPond User"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: lyrics following split voices
2008/8/5 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm surprised that nobody answered exac
ection on Contexts. What do you think?
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Cc: "Paul Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "LilyPond User"
<[EMAIL PROT
2008/8/5 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm surprised that nobody answered exactly this question. If you name your
> main voice "1", then the upper voice of the <<{...} \\ {...} >> construct
> will stay the same Voice context as the single voice.
That's true, it is explained in LM 3.2.1 I'm
