Phil Holmes writes:
> Having spent the time on the Stockhausen, I think it would be a shame
> not to update the page with the good example.
Not aiming to disappoint you further, I always wondered why there are so
many completely different WikiPedia pages for LilyPond. Most have their
some good a
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Johannes Schindelin :
>
> > I think their concern that Scheme is needed to do anything useful is
> > unfounded, and that Scheme just should be disabled for the purpose of
> > the MediaWiki extension.
>
> I thing this was n
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 11:52:59 am Graham Percival wrote:
> You're alive, so you can learn. When you
> stop learning, you're dead.
Paul Erdös said of mathematicians that if they had died,
they had left. If they were not doing mathematics anymore,
they were dead.
Ian
--
___
Graham (et al.),
Programmers are made, not born.
True.
We're not genetically superior to non-programmers.
Speak for yourself! ;-)
When you stop learning, you're dead.
More to the point: when you're dead, you stop learning.
Just my (muck-raking) 2¢.
Kieren.
__
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:22:54PM -0300, Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima wrote:
> 2009/4/22 Graham Percival :
> > As I always say, lilypond can do it if there's enough interest.
> > If there's real, honest, interest in lilypond-in-a-wiki, then
> > somebody will step forwards to work on the issues.
>
2009/4/21 Francisco Vila :
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>> Hi everybody!
>>
>> I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
>> How is it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
> - the LilyPond plugin for mediawiki
I'm
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:32:11AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op maandag 02-02-2009 om 02:21 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Johannes
> Schindelin:
>
> > > Assign two Frogs to the task:
> > > - one person ensures that lilypond input without **any** scheme
> > > will always end in a reasonab
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
>
> > I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic. How is
> > it going? (is it going?)
>
> Are you talking about
>
> - the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
> - the LilyPond plugin for medi
Op maandag 02-02-2009 om 02:21 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Johannes
Schindelin:
> > > Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
> > >
> > > My understanding is that
> > >
> > > a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
> > > infinite loop s
Wikipedia won't allow lilypond due to security and performance reasons
as far as I know.
I and other have already created quite useful mediawiki plugins.
Bert
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there is any progress about t
2009/4/21 Helder Geovane Gomes de Lima :
> Hi everybody!
>
> I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
> How is it going? (is it going?)
Are you talking about
- the LilyPond article on Wikipedia
- the LilyPond plugin for mediawiki
There was an interesting project in http://
Hi everybody!
I would like to know if there is any progress about this topic.
How is it going? (is it going?)
Thanks!
Helder
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> >
> > Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
> >
> > My understanding is that
> >
> > a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Tim Starling, one of the main wikipeda software developers, says:
>
> My understanding is that
>
> a) safe mode is not secure, being trivially DoS-able by short
> infinite loop scripts
As it currently stands, yes.
>
Hi,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
> can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
> [...]
Thanks you for bringing it to the proper place. I've been meaning to, but
got too swamped in work.
It did not exactly help my
There's an interesting discussion (since five years!) why lilypond
can't be integrated into wikipedia yet:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189
A resumé of the discussion is this last comment (from about a week
ago):
We want LilyPond to be as safe to call as, say, ImageMagick
16 matches
Mail list logo
